Comparison Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Ovarian Cancers

Kamonchanok Choosak, Thitirath Thantiprechapong
{"title":"Comparison Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Primary and Secondary Ovarian Cancers","authors":"Kamonchanok Choosak, Thitirath Thantiprechapong","doi":"10.31557/apjcc.2022.7.2.201-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Due to primary and secondary ovarian cancer have different management, preoperative assessment is important. We endeavor to identify the different preoperative clinical characteristics. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study that included 31 patients with secondary ovarian cancer (SOC) and 301 controls with primary ovarian cancer (POC) diagnosed between 2007 and 2018. The demographic parameters, signs, symptoms, preoperative tumor marker levels, and imaging findings were reviewed. Results: The incidence of SOC was 2.5% (66/2605) of all ovarian malignancies. The most common site of origin was the colon (58.1%). Thirty-five percent of the patients with SOC had a history of previous malignancy and 80.8% of them were multiparous. Abdominal mass and bladder symptoms were significantly higher in patients with POC than those with SOC (p < 0.001, p = 0.04, respectively). The preoperative imaging showed that SOC was more often bilateralism (p < 0.001) and more presence of ascites (p = 0.004). The consistency of SOC was cystic-solid (50%). From the multivariate analysis, the risk of SOC was significantly increased in patients who developed previous malignancy, CEA level (>5 ng/mL), and CA 125/CEA ratio (≤25) with the odds ratios (95%CI) of 5.07 (1.52, 16.96), 6.17 (1.68, 22.59) and 12.12 (3.91, 37.59), respectively. Conclusions: The preoperative distinction between POC and SOC is difficult. A history of malignancy, an elevated serum CEA, and CA 125/CEA ratio, can provide a useful clue for diagnosis and proper management in these patients. ","PeriodicalId":436394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcc.2022.7.2.201-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Due to primary and secondary ovarian cancer have different management, preoperative assessment is important. We endeavor to identify the different preoperative clinical characteristics. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study that included 31 patients with secondary ovarian cancer (SOC) and 301 controls with primary ovarian cancer (POC) diagnosed between 2007 and 2018. The demographic parameters, signs, symptoms, preoperative tumor marker levels, and imaging findings were reviewed. Results: The incidence of SOC was 2.5% (66/2605) of all ovarian malignancies. The most common site of origin was the colon (58.1%). Thirty-five percent of the patients with SOC had a history of previous malignancy and 80.8% of them were multiparous. Abdominal mass and bladder symptoms were significantly higher in patients with POC than those with SOC (p < 0.001, p = 0.04, respectively). The preoperative imaging showed that SOC was more often bilateralism (p < 0.001) and more presence of ascites (p = 0.004). The consistency of SOC was cystic-solid (50%). From the multivariate analysis, the risk of SOC was significantly increased in patients who developed previous malignancy, CEA level (>5 ng/mL), and CA 125/CEA ratio (≤25) with the odds ratios (95%CI) of 5.07 (1.52, 16.96), 6.17 (1.68, 22.59) and 12.12 (3.91, 37.59), respectively. Conclusions: The preoperative distinction between POC and SOC is difficult. A history of malignancy, an elevated serum CEA, and CA 125/CEA ratio, can provide a useful clue for diagnosis and proper management in these patients. 
原发性与继发性卵巢癌的临床病理特征比较
目的:由于原发性和继发性卵巢癌有不同的治疗方法,术前评估是重要的。我们努力找出不同的术前临床特征。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了2007年至2018年间诊断为继发性卵巢癌(SOC)的31例患者和301例原发性卵巢癌(POC)的对照组。我们回顾了人口统计学参数、体征、症状、术前肿瘤标志物水平和影像学表现。结果:所有卵巢恶性肿瘤中SOC的发生率为2.5%(66/2605)。最常见的起源部位是结肠(58.1%)。35%的SOC患者既往有恶性肿瘤病史,80.8%的患者曾多次分娩。POC患者的腹部肿块和膀胱症状明显高于SOC患者(p < 0.001, p = 0.04)。术前影像学显示SOC多为双侧(p < 0.001),腹水多见(p = 0.004)。SOC浓度为囊状固体(50%)。多因素分析显示,既往恶性肿瘤、CEA水平(0.5 ng/mL)和CA 125/CEA比值(≤25)的患者发生SOC的风险显著增加,比值比(95%CI)分别为5.07(1.52,16.96)、6.17(1.68,22.59)和12.12(3.91,37.59)。结论:术前很难区分POC和SOC。恶性肿瘤病史、血清CEA和ca125 /CEA比值升高可为诊断和适当治疗提供有用线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信