The definition of RPDIV in impulsive testing and the effect of the electrical conditioning on the variability of the results

A. Caprara, G. Ciotti, A. Cavallini, A. Rumi
{"title":"The definition of RPDIV in impulsive testing and the effect of the electrical conditioning on the variability of the results","authors":"A. Caprara, G. Ciotti, A. Cavallini, A. Rumi","doi":"10.1109/eic47619.2020.9158761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the effect of preconditioning on the variability of the results when measuring the Repetitive Partial Discharges Inception Voltage (RPDIV) of electrical insulation systems subjected to impulsive voltage stresses. The reference International Standard considered in the following (IEC 60034-18-41 [1]) defines the RPDIV as the minimum voltage at which at least five Partial Discharges (PD) occurs in ten voltage impulses applied. Many testing devices have been designed according to such definition: they inject ten voltage impulses and, if five of them trigger PD events, the voltage is recorded as the RPDIV. Otherwise, the voltage is increased until the RPDIV condition is met. On the other hand, other systems focus their analysis on the time behavior of the PD probability in the course of the tests. They do not simply record the RPDIV at the ratio where the number of PDs is greater than 0.5 times the voltage surges, but when it is persistently larger than such threshold. It has been noted that the PD probability (i.e. the number of PD per number of voltage pulses) shows a non-monotone behavior during the RPDIV measurements and consistent variations above and below the 50% threshold occur. Therefore, results coming from the types of equipment having the two different approaches are often noticeably different and, as a consequence, the RPDIV results using different measurement systems might vary depending on how this parameter is calculated. This paper proposes the electrical conditioning as a possible procedure to reduce this variation, and thus to have results independent from the measuring apparatus.","PeriodicalId":286019,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)","volume":"58 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eic47619.2020.9158761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of preconditioning on the variability of the results when measuring the Repetitive Partial Discharges Inception Voltage (RPDIV) of electrical insulation systems subjected to impulsive voltage stresses. The reference International Standard considered in the following (IEC 60034-18-41 [1]) defines the RPDIV as the minimum voltage at which at least five Partial Discharges (PD) occurs in ten voltage impulses applied. Many testing devices have been designed according to such definition: they inject ten voltage impulses and, if five of them trigger PD events, the voltage is recorded as the RPDIV. Otherwise, the voltage is increased until the RPDIV condition is met. On the other hand, other systems focus their analysis on the time behavior of the PD probability in the course of the tests. They do not simply record the RPDIV at the ratio where the number of PDs is greater than 0.5 times the voltage surges, but when it is persistently larger than such threshold. It has been noted that the PD probability (i.e. the number of PD per number of voltage pulses) shows a non-monotone behavior during the RPDIV measurements and consistent variations above and below the 50% threshold occur. Therefore, results coming from the types of equipment having the two different approaches are often noticeably different and, as a consequence, the RPDIV results using different measurement systems might vary depending on how this parameter is calculated. This paper proposes the electrical conditioning as a possible procedure to reduce this variation, and thus to have results independent from the measuring apparatus.
介绍了脉冲试验中RPDIV的定义以及电调节对试验结果变异性的影响
本文研究了脉冲电压应力作用下电绝缘系统重复性局部放电起始电压(RPDIV)测量时,预处理对测量结果变异性的影响。以下考虑的参考国际标准(IEC 60034-18-41[1])将RPDIV定义为在施加的十个电压脉冲中至少发生五个局部放电(PD)的最小电压。许多测试设备都是根据这样的定义设计的:它们注入十个电压脉冲,如果其中五个触发PD事件,则电压被记录为RPDIV。否则,增加电压,直到满足RPDIV条件。另一方面,其他系统将分析重点放在测试过程中PD概率的时间行为上。他们不是简单地记录pd数大于电压浪涌0.5倍的RPDIV,而是记录持续大于该阈值的RPDIV。已经注意到,在RPDIV测量期间,PD概率(即每个数电压脉冲的PD数)显示出非单调行为,并且在50%阈值以上和以下发生一致的变化。因此,使用两种不同方法的设备类型的结果通常有明显的不同,因此,使用不同测量系统的RPDIV结果可能会根据该参数的计算方式而变化。本文提出电气调节作为一种可能的方法来减少这种变化,从而获得独立于测量仪器的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信