THE PROBLEMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER STABILITY IN THE EURO-ASIAN REGION

M. Salikov, S. Kuznetsova, A. Mochalov
{"title":"THE PROBLEMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER STABILITY IN THE EURO-ASIAN REGION","authors":"M. Salikov, S. Kuznetsova, A. Mochalov","doi":"10.34076/2619-0672-2018-1-17-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Problems of stability of constitutional order have both theoretical and practical dimensions and touch all states. In the article, constitutional stability in the context of social changes is discussed.\n\nMethods: Doing the analysis, the authors use special methodology of legal research. In particular,\na comparative-law is broadly applied as well as case studies.\n\nAnalysis: In the first part of the article the authors discuss recent developments in the Russian constitutional legislation concerning electoral systems and informational technologies. In particular, the «Yarovaya Act» is criticized. In the authors’ opinion, legislation that does not meet social demands undermines constitutional stability. Frequent amendments of the Constitution and constitutional legislation (especially electoral one) do not contribute to constitutional stability as well. In the second part the authors analyze constitutional stability through the prism of inter-ethnic relations. They discuss some cases from Indian, Nigerian and Ethiopian experience.\n\nResults: The authors make a conclusion that stable constitutional order does not mean inflexible order. There should be a balance between social changes and maintenance of basic values and institutions. The constitutional order should be rigid enough for social changes not to be able to undermine the constitutional basis and trust of citizens to values, aims and principles proclaimed by the main law of the country.","PeriodicalId":215513,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2018-1-17-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Problems of stability of constitutional order have both theoretical and practical dimensions and touch all states. In the article, constitutional stability in the context of social changes is discussed. Methods: Doing the analysis, the authors use special methodology of legal research. In particular, a comparative-law is broadly applied as well as case studies. Analysis: In the first part of the article the authors discuss recent developments in the Russian constitutional legislation concerning electoral systems and informational technologies. In particular, the «Yarovaya Act» is criticized. In the authors’ opinion, legislation that does not meet social demands undermines constitutional stability. Frequent amendments of the Constitution and constitutional legislation (especially electoral one) do not contribute to constitutional stability as well. In the second part the authors analyze constitutional stability through the prism of inter-ethnic relations. They discuss some cases from Indian, Nigerian and Ethiopian experience. Results: The authors make a conclusion that stable constitutional order does not mean inflexible order. There should be a balance between social changes and maintenance of basic values and institutions. The constitutional order should be rigid enough for social changes not to be able to undermine the constitutional basis and trust of citizens to values, aims and principles proclaimed by the main law of the country.
欧亚地区宪政秩序稳定问题
宪政秩序稳定问题既有理论层面的,也有实践层面的,涉及到所有国家。本文讨论了社会变迁背景下的宪政稳定问题。方法:运用独特的法学研究方法进行分析。特别是,比较法和案例研究被广泛应用。分析:在文章的第一部分,作者讨论了俄罗斯关于选举制度和信息技术的宪法立法的最新发展。特别是,“Yarovaya法案”受到批评。在作者看来,不符合社会需求的立法破坏了宪法的稳定。频繁修改宪法和宪法立法(特别是选举立法)也不利于宪法的稳定。第二部分从民族关系的角度分析宪政稳定性。他们讨论了印度、尼日利亚和埃塞俄比亚的一些案例。结果:稳定的宪政秩序并不意味着僵化的宪政秩序。在社会变革和维持基本价值和体制之间应该有一种平衡。宪法秩序应该足够严格,以使社会变革不能够破坏宪法基础和公民对国家主要法律所宣布的价值、目标和原则的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信