Time is Money: Countering Griefing Attack in Lightning Network

Subhra Mazumdar, Prabal Banerjee, S. Ruj
{"title":"Time is Money: Countering Griefing Attack in Lightning Network","authors":"Subhra Mazumdar, Prabal Banerjee, S. Ruj","doi":"10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lightning Network is the most deployed Bitcoin-compatible Payment Channel Network (PCN), ensuring faster execution of transactions. However, this Layer-two solution has its fair share of problems. Topological analysis on Lightning Network reveals that Griefing Attack is a major problem whereby an adversary intentionally exhausts the channel capacity of the network. Though the attack does not always result in a direct monetary gain of the attacker, blocking of channel capacity for several days prevents several nodes from processing any future transaction request, leading to substantial collateral damage. If the attacker is able to lock funds in multiple paths simultaneously, then a major portion of the network may get stalled, reducing the throughput. Mitigating Griefing Attack still remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose an efficient countermeasure for the attack, known as Griefing-Penalty. To realize it, we propose a new payment protocol HTLC-GP or Hashed Timelock Contract with Griefing-Penalty. It not only preserves privacy but also ensures that an attacker cannot ascribe blame on any honest party present in the path relaying the payment. We evaluate the effectiveness of griefing-penalty using different attack strategies and test it on several snapshots of Lightning Network. Our evaluation results show that loss incurred is substantially high for HTLC-GP compared to HTLC.","PeriodicalId":221956,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Lightning Network is the most deployed Bitcoin-compatible Payment Channel Network (PCN), ensuring faster execution of transactions. However, this Layer-two solution has its fair share of problems. Topological analysis on Lightning Network reveals that Griefing Attack is a major problem whereby an adversary intentionally exhausts the channel capacity of the network. Though the attack does not always result in a direct monetary gain of the attacker, blocking of channel capacity for several days prevents several nodes from processing any future transaction request, leading to substantial collateral damage. If the attacker is able to lock funds in multiple paths simultaneously, then a major portion of the network may get stalled, reducing the throughput. Mitigating Griefing Attack still remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose an efficient countermeasure for the attack, known as Griefing-Penalty. To realize it, we propose a new payment protocol HTLC-GP or Hashed Timelock Contract with Griefing-Penalty. It not only preserves privacy but also ensures that an attacker cannot ascribe blame on any honest party present in the path relaying the payment. We evaluate the effectiveness of griefing-penalty using different attack strategies and test it on several snapshots of Lightning Network. Our evaluation results show that loss incurred is substantially high for HTLC-GP compared to HTLC.
时间就是金钱:对抗闪电网络中的悲伤攻击
闪电网络是部署最多的比特币兼容支付通道网络(PCN),确保更快地执行交易。然而,这种第二层解决方案也存在一些问题。对闪电网络的拓扑分析表明,Griefing攻击是攻击者故意耗尽网络信道容量的主要问题。虽然攻击并不总是导致攻击者获得直接的金钱收益,但通道容量阻塞数天会阻止几个节点处理任何未来的交易请求,从而导致实质性的附带损害。如果攻击者能够同时在多条路径上锁定资金,那么网络的大部分可能会停滞,从而降低吞吐量。减轻悲伤攻击仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在本文中,我们提出了一种有效的应对攻击的对策,称为“悲伤惩罚”。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一种新的支付协议HTLC-GP,即带悲伤惩罚的哈希时限合同。它不仅保护了隐私,而且确保攻击者不能将责任归咎于中继支付路径中存在的任何诚实方。我们使用不同的攻击策略评估了悲伤惩罚的有效性,并在多个闪电网络快照上进行了测试。我们的评估结果表明,HTLC- gp的损失比HTLC高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信