STUDI PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA CERAI GUGAT NOMOR 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS TERHADAP HAK NAFKAH IDDAH

Fatimatuz Zahro, Salsabila Annisa Rohmah
{"title":"STUDI PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA PERKARA CERAI GUGAT NOMOR 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS TERHADAP HAK NAFKAH IDDAH","authors":"Fatimatuz Zahro, Salsabila Annisa Rohmah","doi":"10.33754/masadir.v2i1.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Panel of Judges in deciding the case that the wife has the right of iddah (a period that must be lived by a woman after the death of her husband or after divorce, during which she cannot marry another man) for her claims against her husband. Therefore, to find out the reason for the non-provenance of nusyuz (a wife unreasonably refusing to comply with the wishes or orders of a legitimate husband) in obtaining the right to live iddah in the divorce law Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS based on fiqh and UU Marriage Article 41 of 1974. This issue will be studied using a normative legal approach and a judge's decision study approach. The results of the analysis show that Decision Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS concerning the issue of the right to live iddah in a divorce where the Panel of Judges carries out and decides various considerations in deciding the case: the ex-wife or plaintiff gets the right to live iddah from her ex-husband on the basis of considerations The law refers to Article 149 letter (b) of the KHI which basically states that if a marriage breaks up, the husband is obliged to provide a living. including food to eat and clothing to cover his wife's expenses during the period of iddah. Article 41 letter c of the Marriage Law states that the court can require the husband to provide maintenance or establish obligations for the wife. Keywords: Judge Consideration, Iddah Living , Divorce sue.","PeriodicalId":409505,"journal":{"name":"MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33754/masadir.v2i1.514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Panel of Judges in deciding the case that the wife has the right of iddah (a period that must be lived by a woman after the death of her husband or after divorce, during which she cannot marry another man) for her claims against her husband. Therefore, to find out the reason for the non-provenance of nusyuz (a wife unreasonably refusing to comply with the wishes or orders of a legitimate husband) in obtaining the right to live iddah in the divorce law Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS based on fiqh and UU Marriage Article 41 of 1974. This issue will be studied using a normative legal approach and a judge's decision study approach. The results of the analysis show that Decision Number 474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS concerning the issue of the right to live iddah in a divorce where the Panel of Judges carries out and decides various considerations in deciding the case: the ex-wife or plaintiff gets the right to live iddah from her ex-husband on the basis of considerations The law refers to Article 149 letter (b) of the KHI which basically states that if a marriage breaks up, the husband is obliged to provide a living. including food to eat and clothing to cover his wife's expenses during the period of iddah. Article 41 letter c of the Marriage Law states that the court can require the husband to provide maintenance or establish obligations for the wife. Keywords: Judge Consideration, Iddah Living , Divorce sue.
法官对离婚案件474/Pdt /2020/PA的裁决研究
法官小组就妻子对其丈夫的索赔享有iddah(丈夫去世或离婚后妇女必须度过的一段时间,在此期间她不能与另一男子结婚)的案件作出裁决。因此,根据1974年《第474/Pdt.G/2020/PA.JS号离婚法》第41条,找出nusyuz(妻子不合理地拒绝遵守合法丈夫的意愿或命令)在获得iddah生活权利方面不具有出处的原因。这个问题将使用规范的法律方法和法官的决定研究方法来研究。分析结果表明,决定作品474号/ Pdt.G / 2020 / PA.JS关于生存权的问题iddah离婚的评委的执行情况决定不同的因素在决定:前妻或原告获得生存权iddah从她的前夫的基础上考虑法律指的是第149条信(b)的地块基本状态,如果婚姻破裂,丈夫不得不提供一个生活。包括食物和衣服,以支付他妻子在伊达期间的开销。《婚姻法》第41条(c)款规定,法院可以要求丈夫支付赡养费或为妻子规定义务。Â关键词:法官考量,家庭生活,离婚诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信