The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice

Rinto Wardana
{"title":"The Plea Bargaining System as a Criminalization Model Under the Law Number 19 Year of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transaction Act and the Dignified Justice","authors":"Rinto Wardana","doi":"10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions  would indicate that the Indonesian  criminal Code and regulations have not been  effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts  to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result. ","PeriodicalId":344294,"journal":{"name":"Global Legal Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Legal Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v1i2.4098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the perspective of economic analysis of law theory, the increasing number of criminal convictions  would indicate that the Indonesian  criminal Code and regulations have not been  effective in reducing the rate of crimes. By combining a preliminary hearing, hearing of cases through a special route and the application of the principle of bargaining for sentence in the plea bargaining system, a new mechanism may be formulated in the Indonesia criminal justice proceedings. This criminal justice approach employs the dignified justice principle (teori keadilan bermartabat) approach, whereby, the trial of cases using a preliminary hearing as a special route under a sole judge that is intended for an accused who pleads guilty and bargains for a sentence. Accordingly, this research attempts  to explore the use of the principles of the plea bargaining system as a criminal justice model under the Law Number 19 year of 2016 on the Electronic Information and Transaction Act (“EIT Act”). Equally important, this research employs the juridical-normative method, statute, case, and conceptual approaches in order to obtain a comprehensive result. 
2016年第19号法律《电子信息交易法与尊严正义》下的认罪交易制度定罪模式
从法学理论的经济分析的角度来看,刑事定罪数量的增加表明印度尼西亚的刑法和条例在降低犯罪率方面没有起到有效的作用。通过将预审、特殊途径审理案件和辩诉交易制度中议价减刑原则的运用相结合,可以在印尼刑事司法诉讼中形成新的机制。这种刑事司法方法采用有尊严的司法原则(teori keadilan bermartabat)方法,即在一名单独法官的领导下,对案件的审判采用预审作为一种特殊途径,目的是为认罪并为判刑讨价还价的被告。因此,本研究试图在2016年第19号法律《电子信息与交易法》(以下简称“EIT法”)下探讨辩诉交易制度原则作为刑事司法模式的运用。同样重要的是,本研究采用了司法规范方法、法规、案例和概念方法,以获得全面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信