Goolarabooloo Futures: Mining and Aborigines in Northwest Australia

S. Muecke
{"title":"Goolarabooloo Futures: Mining and Aborigines in Northwest Australia","authors":"S. Muecke","doi":"10.2307/J.CTV19X53V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our apparently postcolonial age, colonization is proceeding apace in Goolarabooloo country near Broome in Western Australia where sovereignty has never been ceded, and no treaty ratified. The colonial ‘settler’ economy was established in the late 19th century with the pearling and pastoral industries, but today it is multinational mining companies (‘extraction colonialism’) that are extending their reach with the urging of the State government and even some Aboriginal agencies. \nThis ethnographic study describes two ‘worlds’: Those (the ‘Moderns’) who like to see themselves as ‘naturally’ extending the territory of a universalist modernity via their institutions of science and technology, governmental organisation, the law and the economy. Under scrutiny, this world turns out to be less robust institutionally and conceptually than it pretends to be; it operates with fantasies, blunders, poor planning, little negotiation and waste. Often it works, but in the instance of the four-year struggle between Woodside Energy and the Goolarabooloo, the latter was able to resist the former’s desire to build a liquefied gas plant on their traditional land. Woodside and its partners left with billions of dollars wasted in the effort. The ‘world’ of the Indigenous Goolarabooloo is the second group of institutions my extended ethnography will describe.","PeriodicalId":231336,"journal":{"name":"The Postcolonial Contemporary","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Postcolonial Contemporary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV19X53V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our apparently postcolonial age, colonization is proceeding apace in Goolarabooloo country near Broome in Western Australia where sovereignty has never been ceded, and no treaty ratified. The colonial ‘settler’ economy was established in the late 19th century with the pearling and pastoral industries, but today it is multinational mining companies (‘extraction colonialism’) that are extending their reach with the urging of the State government and even some Aboriginal agencies. This ethnographic study describes two ‘worlds’: Those (the ‘Moderns’) who like to see themselves as ‘naturally’ extending the territory of a universalist modernity via their institutions of science and technology, governmental organisation, the law and the economy. Under scrutiny, this world turns out to be less robust institutionally and conceptually than it pretends to be; it operates with fantasies, blunders, poor planning, little negotiation and waste. Often it works, but in the instance of the four-year struggle between Woodside Energy and the Goolarabooloo, the latter was able to resist the former’s desire to build a liquefied gas plant on their traditional land. Woodside and its partners left with billions of dollars wasted in the effort. The ‘world’ of the Indigenous Goolarabooloo is the second group of institutions my extended ethnography will describe.
Goolarabooloo期货:澳大利亚西北部的矿业和土著居民
在我们明显的后殖民时代,在西澳大利亚布鲁姆附近的Goolarabooloo国家,殖民化正在迅速进行,那里的主权从未被割让,也没有批准任何条约。殖民地的“定居者”经济是在19世纪晚期建立起来的,以采珠业和畜牧业为基础,但今天,在州政府甚至一些土著机构的敦促下,跨国矿业公司(“采掘殖民主义”)正在扩大他们的影响力。这项民族志研究描述了两个“世界”:那些(“现代人”)喜欢把自己视为“自然地”通过他们的科学和技术机构、政府组织、法律和经济来扩展普遍主义现代性的领土。经过仔细审视,这个世界在制度上和概念上都不如它表面上表现得那么健全;它的运作充满了幻想、错误、糟糕的计划、很少的谈判和浪费。这通常是有效的,但在Woodside Energy和Goolarabooloo之间长达四年的斗争中,后者能够抵制前者在其传统土地上建造液化天然气工厂的愿望。伍德赛德及其合作伙伴在这一努力中浪费了数十亿美元。土着gooolarabooloo的“世界”是我扩展人种志将要描述的第二组机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信