Knowledge And Practice of Healthcare Ethics Among Healthcare Professionals: An Awareness Creation Apparatus

Charles Owusu-Aduomi Botchwey
{"title":"Knowledge And Practice of Healthcare Ethics Among Healthcare Professionals: An Awareness Creation Apparatus","authors":"Charles Owusu-Aduomi Botchwey","doi":"10.22461/jhea.2.7167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Because healthcare professionals are well versed in patients' fundamental rights and obligations, people are growing more worried about their ethical behavior. The accusations regarding unethical behavior and the rise in legal action against healthcare providers frequently reflect this. Threats and intimidation directed at healthcare workers have also increased recently. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare ethics among healthcare professionals in Winneba Municipal Hospital and Trauma and Specialist Hospital in Effutu Municipality in the Central Region of Ghana. Methods: The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design and a qualitative research approach. The research design used offered a deeper understanding of the experiences, phenomena, and settings under study while addressing the \"what,\" \"how,\" and \"why\" of the research questions. The interpretive approach was chosen as the research's epistemological stance because it emphasised how unique humans are from the material world and how research methodologies should reflect this distinction. Results: This study identified ethical issues bordering on areas of communication, decision-making, confidentiality, and professional duty as key themes for ethical reflection. It explored the experiences of healthcare professions in different fields of practice within the clinical context. The study also identified strategies for improving knowledge and adherence to ethical codes regarding the profession, which are education, routine orientation, workshops and retraining programmes. Conclusion: Despite the commendable efforts of health professionals in adhering to healthcare ethics, policy-makers in the healthcare arena of Ghana such as the Ministry of Health, Ghana Health Service and the Association of Health Administration and Support Services should gear health policy towards enhancing staff-patient relationship. Keywords: Healthcare professionals, patients' fundamental rights and obligations, unethical behaviour, ethical reflection, Ethical codes and Communication.","PeriodicalId":164934,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22461/jhea.2.7167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because healthcare professionals are well versed in patients' fundamental rights and obligations, people are growing more worried about their ethical behavior. The accusations regarding unethical behavior and the rise in legal action against healthcare providers frequently reflect this. Threats and intimidation directed at healthcare workers have also increased recently. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess the knowledge and practice of healthcare ethics among healthcare professionals in Winneba Municipal Hospital and Trauma and Specialist Hospital in Effutu Municipality in the Central Region of Ghana. Methods: The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design and a qualitative research approach. The research design used offered a deeper understanding of the experiences, phenomena, and settings under study while addressing the "what," "how," and "why" of the research questions. The interpretive approach was chosen as the research's epistemological stance because it emphasised how unique humans are from the material world and how research methodologies should reflect this distinction. Results: This study identified ethical issues bordering on areas of communication, decision-making, confidentiality, and professional duty as key themes for ethical reflection. It explored the experiences of healthcare professions in different fields of practice within the clinical context. The study also identified strategies for improving knowledge and adherence to ethical codes regarding the profession, which are education, routine orientation, workshops and retraining programmes. Conclusion: Despite the commendable efforts of health professionals in adhering to healthcare ethics, policy-makers in the healthcare arena of Ghana such as the Ministry of Health, Ghana Health Service and the Association of Health Administration and Support Services should gear health policy towards enhancing staff-patient relationship. Keywords: Healthcare professionals, patients' fundamental rights and obligations, unethical behaviour, ethical reflection, Ethical codes and Communication.
卫生保健专业人员的卫生保健伦理知识和实践:一个意识创造装置
背景:由于医疗保健专业人员非常了解患者的基本权利和义务,人们越来越担心他们的道德行为。关于不道德行为的指控和针对医疗保健提供者的法律行动的增加经常反映了这一点。针对保健工作者的威胁和恐吓最近也有所增加。目的:本研究的目的是评估加纳中部地区埃富图市温尼巴市属医院和创伤专科医院的卫生保健专业人员的卫生保健伦理知识和实践。方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计和定性研究方法。所使用的研究设计提供了对所研究的经验、现象和环境的更深入的理解,同时解决了研究问题的“什么”、“如何”和“为什么”。之所以选择解释方法作为研究的认识论立场,是因为它强调人类与物质世界的独特之处,以及研究方法应如何反映这种区别。结果:本研究确定了沟通、决策、保密和职业责任等领域的道德问题,作为道德反思的关键主题。它探讨了医疗保健专业人员在临床背景下不同领域的实践经验。这项研究还确定了提高对该专业的知识和遵守道德守则的战略,即教育、例行指导、讲习班和再培训方案。结论:尽管卫生专业人员在坚持卫生保健道德方面做出了值得赞扬的努力,但加纳卫生保健领域的决策者,如卫生部、加纳卫生服务局和卫生管理和支持服务协会,应使卫生政策朝着加强医患关系的方向发展。关键词:医护人员,患者的基本权利和义务,不道德行为,道德反思,道德规范和沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信