The Half-Mangled Narrator: The Violence of Psychic Dissection in William Godwin’s Caleb Williams

E. Parisot
{"title":"The Half-Mangled Narrator: The Violence of Psychic Dissection in William Godwin’s Caleb Williams","authors":"E. Parisot","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2015.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trope of psychic dissection, used to describe the delineation of mental processes and their formative contribution to character and identity, was largely made available to readers and writers of the late eighteenth century by developments in the emerging field of psychology. \"All that we know of the body,\" proposes Thomas Reid in his Inquiry into the Human Mind, \"is owing to anatomical dissection and observation, and it must be by an anatomy of the mind that we can discover its powers and principles\" (5). (1) By the time William Godwin's Things as They Are; or, The Adventures of Caleb Williams was published and receiving critical response, the trope was being employed aptly to describe Godwin's method of characterization. Godwin is lauded for the way \"he rivets our attention to a minute dissection of the characters, feelings, and emotions,\" and for his \"chief skill ... in delineating in the wanderings of the intellect ... which strangely delights in the most afflicting and humiliating of human miseries\" (Rev. of Caleb Williams 564; Croker 218). Godwin himself--in his preface to the 1832 edition of Fleetwood--confirms the centrality of metaphorical dissection to his preference for first-person narration in Caleb Williams. As a penetrating form of enquiry, it was \"infinitely the best adapted\" to: the analysis of the private and internal operations of the mind, employing my metaphysical dissecting knife in tracing and laying bare the involutions of motive, and recording the gradually accumulating impulses, which led the personages I had to describe primarily to adopt the particular way of proceeding in which they afterwards embarked, (qtd. in Caleb Williams 351) While Godwin's conceit of a \"metaphysical dissecting knife\" echoes Reid's Inquiry, his commitment to detailing the \"gradually accumulating impulses\" that give rise to an individual's character and behavior is palpably indebted to the associationist principles of John Locke and David Hartley (a debt also reflected in Godwin's own doctrine of necessity and its extension to the faculty of the mind). (2) Enlightenment philosophies of the mind evidently bore considerable influence upon Godwin, not only facilitating the adoption of dissection as a literary trope, but also the transformation of the literary sphere into a theatre fit for clinical experimentation and enquiry. This intellectual debt has not gone unnoticed in recent scholarship. Most notably, William D. Brewer's study of the mental anatomies of Godwin and Mary Shelley explores precisely this influence on Godwin, and how Enlightenment-and Romantic-era theories of the mind shaped his view of literary works as \"thought-experiments\" and \"imaginary laboratories\" in the \"'science' of mental anatomy\" (19). With particular regard to Caleb Williams, Brewer not only asserts that Caleb undertakes the role of an \"amateur mental anatomist\" preoccupied with both Falkland's and his own state of mind, but that Godwin \"also envisioned the 'ideal reader' as a mental anatomist\"--a view I concur with entirely in this essay (40, 44). Brewer's emphasis on anatomization--which primarily rests on Godwin's fiction--is further validated by Angela Monsam's reading of Godwin's Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman as a hybrid literary performance labeled \"autopsical biography\" (110). Godwin substantiates this method in his preface to the Memoirs, detailing the way he often steered Mary's conversation toward the formative influences and events of her life, and how these discussions were recorded and augmented by interviews with Mary's acquaintances (Collected Novels 1: 88). (3) For Monsam, not only is the resulting Memoirs discernibly influenced by contemporary dissection reports, but it also further reveals Godwin's methodological alliance with the dissecting surgeon, joined in their pursuit of knowledge and dispelling of suspicion by laying bare and examining the minutiae of the subject. …","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"431 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2015.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The trope of psychic dissection, used to describe the delineation of mental processes and their formative contribution to character and identity, was largely made available to readers and writers of the late eighteenth century by developments in the emerging field of psychology. "All that we know of the body," proposes Thomas Reid in his Inquiry into the Human Mind, "is owing to anatomical dissection and observation, and it must be by an anatomy of the mind that we can discover its powers and principles" (5). (1) By the time William Godwin's Things as They Are; or, The Adventures of Caleb Williams was published and receiving critical response, the trope was being employed aptly to describe Godwin's method of characterization. Godwin is lauded for the way "he rivets our attention to a minute dissection of the characters, feelings, and emotions," and for his "chief skill ... in delineating in the wanderings of the intellect ... which strangely delights in the most afflicting and humiliating of human miseries" (Rev. of Caleb Williams 564; Croker 218). Godwin himself--in his preface to the 1832 edition of Fleetwood--confirms the centrality of metaphorical dissection to his preference for first-person narration in Caleb Williams. As a penetrating form of enquiry, it was "infinitely the best adapted" to: the analysis of the private and internal operations of the mind, employing my metaphysical dissecting knife in tracing and laying bare the involutions of motive, and recording the gradually accumulating impulses, which led the personages I had to describe primarily to adopt the particular way of proceeding in which they afterwards embarked, (qtd. in Caleb Williams 351) While Godwin's conceit of a "metaphysical dissecting knife" echoes Reid's Inquiry, his commitment to detailing the "gradually accumulating impulses" that give rise to an individual's character and behavior is palpably indebted to the associationist principles of John Locke and David Hartley (a debt also reflected in Godwin's own doctrine of necessity and its extension to the faculty of the mind). (2) Enlightenment philosophies of the mind evidently bore considerable influence upon Godwin, not only facilitating the adoption of dissection as a literary trope, but also the transformation of the literary sphere into a theatre fit for clinical experimentation and enquiry. This intellectual debt has not gone unnoticed in recent scholarship. Most notably, William D. Brewer's study of the mental anatomies of Godwin and Mary Shelley explores precisely this influence on Godwin, and how Enlightenment-and Romantic-era theories of the mind shaped his view of literary works as "thought-experiments" and "imaginary laboratories" in the "'science' of mental anatomy" (19). With particular regard to Caleb Williams, Brewer not only asserts that Caleb undertakes the role of an "amateur mental anatomist" preoccupied with both Falkland's and his own state of mind, but that Godwin "also envisioned the 'ideal reader' as a mental anatomist"--a view I concur with entirely in this essay (40, 44). Brewer's emphasis on anatomization--which primarily rests on Godwin's fiction--is further validated by Angela Monsam's reading of Godwin's Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman as a hybrid literary performance labeled "autopsical biography" (110). Godwin substantiates this method in his preface to the Memoirs, detailing the way he often steered Mary's conversation toward the formative influences and events of her life, and how these discussions were recorded and augmented by interviews with Mary's acquaintances (Collected Novels 1: 88). (3) For Monsam, not only is the resulting Memoirs discernibly influenced by contemporary dissection reports, but it also further reveals Godwin's methodological alliance with the dissecting surgeon, joined in their pursuit of knowledge and dispelling of suspicion by laying bare and examining the minutiae of the subject. …
半破碎的叙述者:威廉·戈德温的《迦勒·威廉姆斯》中精神解剖的暴力
心理解剖的比喻,用来描述心理过程的描绘,以及它们对性格和身份的形成性贡献,在很大程度上是由18世纪后期新兴心理学领域的发展提供给读者和作家的。“我们对身体的所有了解,”托马斯·里德在他的《人类心灵的探究》中提出,“都是由于解剖学上的解剖和观察,而且必须通过对心灵的解剖,我们才能发现它的力量和原理”(5)。或者,《迦勒·威廉姆斯历险记》出版并受到批评,这个比喻被恰当地用来描述戈德温的人物塑造方法。戈德温因其“将我们的注意力吸引到对人物、感情和情感的细致剖析上”的方式,以及他的“主要技巧……在描绘智力的漫游时……它奇怪地以人类最痛苦、最屈辱的苦难为乐”(凯莱布·威廉姆斯Rev. 564;克罗克218)。戈德温本人——在1832年版《弗利特伍德》的序言中——证实了隐喻剖析在他偏爱《迦勒·威廉姆斯》第一人称叙述中的中心地位。作为一种深入的调查形式,它“无限地适合于”:对心灵的私人和内部运作的分析,使用我的形而上的解剖刀来追踪和揭示动机的错综复杂,并记录逐渐积累的冲动,这使得我不得不首先描述的人物采用了他们后来开始的特定方式。虽然戈德温对“形而上学的解剖刀”的幻想与里德的《探究》相呼应,但他对“逐渐积累的冲动”的详细描述,这些冲动导致了个人的性格和行为,这显然要归功于约翰·洛克和大卫·哈特利的联想主义原则(戈德温自己的必然性学说及其对思维能力的延伸也反映了这一点)。(2)显然,启蒙运动的思想哲学对戈德温产生了相当大的影响,不仅促进了解剖作为一种文学修辞的采用,而且还将文学领域转变为适合临床实验和探究的剧场。在最近的学术研究中,这种智力债务并没有被忽视。最值得注意的是,威廉·d·布鲁尔(William D. Brewer)对戈德温和玛丽·雪莱(Mary Shelley)的心理解剖的研究,准确地探讨了这种对戈德温的影响,以及启蒙和浪漫主义时代的心理理论如何塑造了他的观点,即文学作品是“心理解剖‘科学’”中的“思想实验”和“想象实验室”(19)。特别是关于Caleb Williams, Brewer不仅断言Caleb承担了“业余精神解剖学家”的角色,专注于福克兰和他自己的精神状态,而且Godwin“也将‘理想读者’设想为精神解剖学家”——我在这篇文章中完全同意这一观点(40,44)。布鲁尔对解剖的强调——主要基于戈德温的小说——在安吉拉·蒙萨姆(Angela Monsam)阅读戈德温的《女权辩护作者回忆录》(Memoirs of the Author of a辩白者)时得到了进一步的证实,她将其视为一种被称为“解剖传记”的混合文学表演(110)。戈德温在《回忆录》的序言中证实了这种方法,详细描述了他如何经常引导玛丽的谈话,谈论她生活中的影响因素和事件,以及如何通过对玛丽的熟人的采访来记录和充实这些讨论(《小说选集》1:88)。(3)对Monsam来说,由此产生的回忆录不仅明显受到当代解剖报告的影响,而且还进一步揭示了戈德温与解剖外科医生在方法上的联盟,他们通过揭露和检查主题的细节来追求知识和消除怀疑。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信