Historical and conceptual aspects

G. Berríos
{"title":"Historical and conceptual aspects","authors":"G. Berríos","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198794257.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Inpatient treatment’ in psychiatry names a cluster of therapeutic activities whose meaning and justification have changed throughout history. Currently, an emphasis on the success of neurobiological treatment tends to give the impression that the spaces of care themselves are little more than short-term containers. This would be wrong. Best considered as dynamic environments, spaces of care have always had a profound effect on the bodies and minds of their occupants. Whether such affects have been negative or positive has depended upon the sociopolitical, economic, and theoretical factors governing their organization. To understand and improve these spaces of care it is important to realize that they sit at the intersection of various dimensions: container versus dynamic, physical versus social, custodial versus interventionistic, intramural versus extramural, institutional versus rehabilitatory, and communitarian versus societal. Throughout the centuries, a variety of therapeutic interventions have been offered within these spaces. Because their nature, ethics, and rationale have repeatedly changed, it may be more sensible to consider the current state of inpatient psychiatry not as the final stage in the evolution of the ‘science of psychiatry’ but as a mere moment in the evolution of a never-ending interpretative process about the meaning of madness.","PeriodicalId":121860,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Inpatient Psychiatry","volume":"58 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Inpatient Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198794257.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Inpatient treatment’ in psychiatry names a cluster of therapeutic activities whose meaning and justification have changed throughout history. Currently, an emphasis on the success of neurobiological treatment tends to give the impression that the spaces of care themselves are little more than short-term containers. This would be wrong. Best considered as dynamic environments, spaces of care have always had a profound effect on the bodies and minds of their occupants. Whether such affects have been negative or positive has depended upon the sociopolitical, economic, and theoretical factors governing their organization. To understand and improve these spaces of care it is important to realize that they sit at the intersection of various dimensions: container versus dynamic, physical versus social, custodial versus interventionistic, intramural versus extramural, institutional versus rehabilitatory, and communitarian versus societal. Throughout the centuries, a variety of therapeutic interventions have been offered within these spaces. Because their nature, ethics, and rationale have repeatedly changed, it may be more sensible to consider the current state of inpatient psychiatry not as the final stage in the evolution of the ‘science of psychiatry’ but as a mere moment in the evolution of a never-ending interpretative process about the meaning of madness.
历史和概念方面
精神病学中的“住院治疗”指的是一系列治疗活动,这些活动的意义和理由在历史上一直在变化。目前,强调神经生物学治疗的成功往往给人的印象是,护理空间本身只不过是短期的容器。这是错误的。作为动态环境,关怀空间总是对居住者的身体和思想产生深远的影响。这种影响是消极的还是积极的,取决于控制其组织的社会政治、经济和理论因素。为了理解和改善这些护理空间,重要的是要认识到它们位于各种维度的交叉点:容器与动态,物理与社会,监护与干预,校内与校外,机构与康复,社区与社会。几个世纪以来,在这些空间中提供了各种治疗干预措施。因为它们的性质、伦理和基本原理都在不断地改变,所以更明智的做法是,不要把住院精神病学的现状看作是“精神病学”进化的最后阶段,而应该看作是对疯狂意义永无止境的解释过程中进化的一个瞬间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信