Phonaesthetics and personality—Why we do not only prefer Romance languages

Anna Winkler, Vita V. Kogan, S. Reiterer
{"title":"Phonaesthetics and personality—Why we do not only prefer Romance languages","authors":"Anna Winkler, Vita V. Kogan, S. Reiterer","doi":"10.3389/flang.2023.1043619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Previous aesthetic research has set its main focus on visual and auditory, primarily music, stimuli with only a handful of studies exploring the aesthetic potential of linguistic stimuli. In the present study, we investigate for the first time the effects of personality traits on phonaesthetic language ratings. Methods Twenty-three under-researched, “rarer” (less learned and therefore less known as a foreign language or L2) and minority languages were evaluated by 145 participants in terms of eroticism, beauty, status, and orderliness, subjectively perceived based on language sound. Results Overall, Romance languages (Catalan, Portuguese, Romanian) were still among the top six erotic languages of the experiment together with “Romance-sounding,” but less known languages like Breton and Basque. Catalan and Portuguese were also placed among the top six most beautiful languages. The Germanic languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and Icelandic) were perceived as more prestigious/higher in terms of status, however to some degree conditioned by their recognition/familiarity. Thus, we partly replicated the results of our earlier studies on the Romance language preferences (the so-called Latin Lover effect) and the perceived higher status of the Germanic languages and scrutinized again the effects of familiarity/language recognition, thereby calling into question the above mentioned concepts of the Latin Lover effect and the status of Germanic languages. We also found significant effects of personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness) on phonaesthetic ratings. Different personality types appreciated different aspects of languages: e.g., whereas neurotics had strong opinions about languages' eroticism, more conscientious participants gave significantly different ratings for status. Introverts were more generous in their ratings overall in comparison to extroverts. We did not find strong connections between personality types and specific languages or linguistic features (sonority, speech rate). Overall, personality traits were largely overridden by other individual differences: familiarity with languages (socio-cultural construals, the Romanization effect—perceiving a particular language as a Romance language) and participants' native language/L1. Discussion For language education in the global context, our results mean that introducing greater linguistic diversity in school and universities might result in greater appreciation and motivation to learn lesser-known and minority languages. Even though we generally prefer Romance languages to listen to and to study, different personality types are attracted to different language families and thus make potentially successful learners of these languages.","PeriodicalId":350337,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Language Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2023.1043619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Previous aesthetic research has set its main focus on visual and auditory, primarily music, stimuli with only a handful of studies exploring the aesthetic potential of linguistic stimuli. In the present study, we investigate for the first time the effects of personality traits on phonaesthetic language ratings. Methods Twenty-three under-researched, “rarer” (less learned and therefore less known as a foreign language or L2) and minority languages were evaluated by 145 participants in terms of eroticism, beauty, status, and orderliness, subjectively perceived based on language sound. Results Overall, Romance languages (Catalan, Portuguese, Romanian) were still among the top six erotic languages of the experiment together with “Romance-sounding,” but less known languages like Breton and Basque. Catalan and Portuguese were also placed among the top six most beautiful languages. The Germanic languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and Icelandic) were perceived as more prestigious/higher in terms of status, however to some degree conditioned by their recognition/familiarity. Thus, we partly replicated the results of our earlier studies on the Romance language preferences (the so-called Latin Lover effect) and the perceived higher status of the Germanic languages and scrutinized again the effects of familiarity/language recognition, thereby calling into question the above mentioned concepts of the Latin Lover effect and the status of Germanic languages. We also found significant effects of personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness) on phonaesthetic ratings. Different personality types appreciated different aspects of languages: e.g., whereas neurotics had strong opinions about languages' eroticism, more conscientious participants gave significantly different ratings for status. Introverts were more generous in their ratings overall in comparison to extroverts. We did not find strong connections between personality types and specific languages or linguistic features (sonority, speech rate). Overall, personality traits were largely overridden by other individual differences: familiarity with languages (socio-cultural construals, the Romanization effect—perceiving a particular language as a Romance language) and participants' native language/L1. Discussion For language education in the global context, our results mean that introducing greater linguistic diversity in school and universities might result in greater appreciation and motivation to learn lesser-known and minority languages. Even though we generally prefer Romance languages to listen to and to study, different personality types are attracted to different language families and thus make potentially successful learners of these languages.
语音美学和个性——为什么我们不仅喜欢罗曼语
以前的美学研究主要集中在视觉和听觉上,主要是音乐,只有少数研究探索语言刺激的审美潜力。在本研究中,我们首次探讨了人格特质对语音审美语言评分的影响。方法由145名被试对23种未被充分研究的“稀有”语言(较少被学习,因此较少被称为外语或第二语言)和少数民族语言进行情色性、美观性、地位性和有序性评价,这些评价基于语言声音的主观感知。结果总的来说,罗曼语(加泰罗尼亚语、葡萄牙语、罗马尼亚语)和“听起来罗曼语”但不太为人所知的布列塔尼语和巴斯克语仍然是实验中最受青睐的六种情色语言。加泰罗尼亚语和葡萄牙语也被列入最美丽的六种语言之列。日耳曼语言(瑞典语、挪威语、丹麦语和冰岛语)在地位方面被认为更有声望/更高,但在某种程度上受到他们的认可/熟悉程度的限制。因此,我们在一定程度上重复了我们早期关于罗曼语偏好(所谓的拉丁情人效应)和日耳曼语言更高地位的研究结果,并再次审视了熟悉/语言识别的影响,从而对上述拉丁情人效应和日耳曼语言地位的概念提出了质疑。我们还发现,性格特征(神经质、外向性和尽责性)对语音美学评分有显著影响。不同的性格类型欣赏语言的不同方面:例如,神经质的人对语言的情色有强烈的看法,而更认真的参与者对语言的地位给出了显著不同的评级。总的来说,内向的人比外向的人更慷慨。我们没有发现人格类型与特定语言或语言特征(声音、语速)之间有很强的联系。总体而言,人格特征在很大程度上被其他个体差异所覆盖:对语言的熟悉程度(社会文化识解、罗马化效应——将特定语言视为罗马语言)和参与者的母语/母语。对于全球背景下的语言教育,我们的研究结果意味着在学校和大学中引入更多的语言多样性可能会导致更大的欣赏和学习不太知名和少数民族语言的动力。尽管我们通常更喜欢听和学习罗曼语,但不同的性格类型被不同的语系所吸引,从而成为这些语言的潜在成功学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信