MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA: Outage Probability Analysis and BER comparative study

Abdelbari Falloun, Anass Deroussi, Abdessalam Ait Madi
{"title":"MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA: Outage Probability Analysis and BER comparative study","authors":"Abdelbari Falloun, Anass Deroussi, Abdessalam Ait Madi","doi":"10.1109/IRASET57153.2023.10153065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"5G wireless technology is available to many more users than other cellular networks. For users, there are several ways to connect to base stations, including Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA), Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA), and Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). This last one is considered the best option for 5G, which enables sharing the same resources (e.g., frequency, time, and code domain resources) with multiple users. Furthermore, NOMA permits massive connections and increases the efficiency of the spectrum network by using strategies for radio resource optimization and interference control that involves successive interference cancellation (SIC). There are two types of users: strong and weak. A high data rate is required by strong users, while a low one is sufficient for weak users. Throughout this paper, we compare the rate achievable capacity, outage probability (OP), and Bit Error Rate (BER) indicatively with transmit power, of those two users' type. [Moreover, we also compare the outage probability per fair and fixed power allocation (PA), applied respectively to NOMA and OMA.. This study centers on creating a MATLAB framework for systems using non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). All schemes are run in MATLAB Version R2021a. The obtained results concluds that NOMA is the better option. Furthermore, we suggest MIMO as an alternative solution to increase performance and decrease the outage probability. In addition, we compare MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA in terms of performance for the two types of users to demonstrate the advantages of the MIMO-NOMA design.","PeriodicalId":228989,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRASET57153.2023.10153065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

5G wireless technology is available to many more users than other cellular networks. For users, there are several ways to connect to base stations, including Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA), Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA), and Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). This last one is considered the best option for 5G, which enables sharing the same resources (e.g., frequency, time, and code domain resources) with multiple users. Furthermore, NOMA permits massive connections and increases the efficiency of the spectrum network by using strategies for radio resource optimization and interference control that involves successive interference cancellation (SIC). There are two types of users: strong and weak. A high data rate is required by strong users, while a low one is sufficient for weak users. Throughout this paper, we compare the rate achievable capacity, outage probability (OP), and Bit Error Rate (BER) indicatively with transmit power, of those two users' type. [Moreover, we also compare the outage probability per fair and fixed power allocation (PA), applied respectively to NOMA and OMA.. This study centers on creating a MATLAB framework for systems using non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA). All schemes are run in MATLAB Version R2021a. The obtained results concluds that NOMA is the better option. Furthermore, we suggest MIMO as an alternative solution to increase performance and decrease the outage probability. In addition, we compare MIMO-NOMA and MIMO-OMA in terms of performance for the two types of users to demonstrate the advantages of the MIMO-NOMA design.
MIMO-NOMA和MIMO-OMA:中断概率分析和误码率比较研究
与其他蜂窝网络相比,5G无线技术可供更多用户使用。对于用户来说,与基站的连接方式有FDMA (Frequency Division Multiple Access)、OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access)、OMA (Orthogonal Multiple Access)和NOMA (Non-orthogonal Multiple Access)。最后一种被认为是5G的最佳选择,它可以与多个用户共享相同的资源(例如,频率、时间和代码域资源)。此外,NOMA允许大规模连接,并通过使用涉及连续干扰消除(SIC)的无线电资源优化和干扰控制策略提高频谱网络的效率。有两类用户:强用户和弱用户。强用户需要高的数据速率,弱用户需要低的数据速率。在整篇文章中,我们比较了这两种用户类型的速率可达容量、中断概率(OP)和误码率(BER)与发射功率的关系。[此外,我们还比较了分别应用于NOMA和OMA的公平和固定功率分配(PA)的停电概率。]本研究的重点是为使用非正交多址(NOMA)的系统创建MATLAB框架。所有方案均在MATLAB R2021a版本中运行。所得结果表明,NOMA是较好的选择。此外,我们建议MIMO作为提高性能和降低中断概率的替代解决方案。此外,我们比较了MIMO-NOMA和MIMO-OMA两种类型用户的性能,以展示MIMO-NOMA设计的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书