{"title":"Measurement of the scattering characteristics of the eye in relation to pupil size","authors":"J. Barbur, D. Edgar, E. G. Woodward","doi":"10.1364/vsia.1995.sud3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the amount of scattered light in the eye is large, either as a result of changes in the structure of the eye or the presence of intense sources of light, this results in significant impairment of vision, sometimes described as disability glare (Vos and Bouman, 1959; Vos, 1984). The effects of scattered light on image resolution and sharpness can be quite significant, with massive loss of sensitivity particularly in the high frequency range (Hess and Woo, 1978; Koch and Lie, 1990). A gradual increase in scattered light with age makes it possible for the visual system to adapt to a lower image contrast and hence to tolerate as acceptable a poor level of image quality (IJspeert et al, 1990). Scattered light does not cause an immediate decrease in Snellen Acuity (which is usually measured with high-contrast letters). This apparently normal performance explains why increased scatter in often undetected in routine eye examinations. The effects of scattered light on visual performance become more apparent in patients with opacities of the ocular media following refractive surgery, in cases of corneal oedema, keratoconus, cataracts and various forms of corneal dystrophy (Koch, 1989; Elliot et al, 1989). The ability to measure reliably small changes in the level and angular distribution of scattered light in the eye has been of interest clinically in monitoring the effects of drugs on media opacities or the recovery of corneal transparency following photorefractive keratectomy (Lohmann et al, 1991). In spite of what are potentially useful clinical applications for the measurement of the scatter function of the eye, the monitoring of small changes in light scatter parameters has not been very successful in a clinical context, the level of variability being very high (Elliot and Bullimore, 1993). One aim of the present study is to investigate the extent to which measured variability can be attributed to instrumentation and measurement error or to genuine changes in the pattern of scattered light in the same eye. In addition, the scattering of light may not always be uniform over the pupil, as a result of non-uniform distribution of ocular opacities and scattering centres. Measuring the effect of pupil size on light scatter is therefore important and may account for some of the observed variability. Unless the size of the pupil is known at the time of measurement, and its effects accounted for, small changes in light scatter parameters (i.e., the k and n values below) cannot be separated from the effects of pupil size, and hence they cannot be attributed easily to other factors under investigation. Another aim of this study was therefore to investigate the effect of pupil size on the scatter function of the eye.","PeriodicalId":428257,"journal":{"name":"Vision Science and its Applications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Science and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.1995.sud3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
When the amount of scattered light in the eye is large, either as a result of changes in the structure of the eye or the presence of intense sources of light, this results in significant impairment of vision, sometimes described as disability glare (Vos and Bouman, 1959; Vos, 1984). The effects of scattered light on image resolution and sharpness can be quite significant, with massive loss of sensitivity particularly in the high frequency range (Hess and Woo, 1978; Koch and Lie, 1990). A gradual increase in scattered light with age makes it possible for the visual system to adapt to a lower image contrast and hence to tolerate as acceptable a poor level of image quality (IJspeert et al, 1990). Scattered light does not cause an immediate decrease in Snellen Acuity (which is usually measured with high-contrast letters). This apparently normal performance explains why increased scatter in often undetected in routine eye examinations. The effects of scattered light on visual performance become more apparent in patients with opacities of the ocular media following refractive surgery, in cases of corneal oedema, keratoconus, cataracts and various forms of corneal dystrophy (Koch, 1989; Elliot et al, 1989). The ability to measure reliably small changes in the level and angular distribution of scattered light in the eye has been of interest clinically in monitoring the effects of drugs on media opacities or the recovery of corneal transparency following photorefractive keratectomy (Lohmann et al, 1991). In spite of what are potentially useful clinical applications for the measurement of the scatter function of the eye, the monitoring of small changes in light scatter parameters has not been very successful in a clinical context, the level of variability being very high (Elliot and Bullimore, 1993). One aim of the present study is to investigate the extent to which measured variability can be attributed to instrumentation and measurement error or to genuine changes in the pattern of scattered light in the same eye. In addition, the scattering of light may not always be uniform over the pupil, as a result of non-uniform distribution of ocular opacities and scattering centres. Measuring the effect of pupil size on light scatter is therefore important and may account for some of the observed variability. Unless the size of the pupil is known at the time of measurement, and its effects accounted for, small changes in light scatter parameters (i.e., the k and n values below) cannot be separated from the effects of pupil size, and hence they cannot be attributed easily to other factors under investigation. Another aim of this study was therefore to investigate the effect of pupil size on the scatter function of the eye.
当眼睛中的散射光量很大时,无论是由于眼睛结构的变化还是强光源的存在,都会导致严重的视力损害,有时被描述为残疾眩光(Vos和Bouman, 1959;Vos, 1984)。散射光对图像分辨率和清晰度的影响可能相当显著,特别是在高频范围内的灵敏度损失很大(Hess和Woo, 1978;Koch and Lie, 1990)。随着年龄的增长,散射光逐渐增加,使得视觉系统能够适应较低的图像对比度,从而可以容忍较差的图像质量水平(IJspeert等人,1990)。散射光不会导致斯奈伦敏锐度(通常用高对比度字母测量)的立即下降。这种表面上正常的表现解释了为什么在常规眼科检查中经常检测不到散射增加。在屈光手术后出现眼介质混浊、角膜水肿、圆锥角膜、白内障和各种形式的角膜营养不良的患者中,散射光对视力的影响更为明显(Koch, 1989;Elliot et al, 1989)。能够可靠地测量眼内散射光水平和角度分布的微小变化,在临床监测药物对中膜混浊的影响或光屈光性角膜切除术后角膜透明度的恢复方面具有重要意义(Lohmann et al, 1991)。尽管对眼睛散射功能的测量具有潜在的临床应用价值,但在临床环境中对光散射参数微小变化的监测并不是很成功,变异性水平非常高(Elliot和Bullimore, 1993)。本研究的目的之一是调查测量的变异性在多大程度上可归因于仪器和测量误差,或归因于同一只眼睛中散射光模式的真正变化。此外,由于眼混浊和散射中心分布不均匀,光在瞳孔上的散射可能并不总是均匀的。因此,测量瞳孔大小对光散射的影响是很重要的,并且可以解释一些观察到的变化。除非在测量时知道瞳孔的大小,并且考虑到瞳孔的影响,否则光散射参数(即下面的k和n值)的微小变化不能与瞳孔大小的影响分开,因此它们不能轻易归因于正在调查的其他因素。因此,本研究的另一个目的是研究瞳孔大小对眼睛散射功能的影响。