African Agency for Development: Progress, Contradictions, and Complexities in the Era of Globalisation

T. Moyo, A. Chikwanha
{"title":"African Agency for Development: Progress, Contradictions, and Complexities in the Era of Globalisation","authors":"T. Moyo, A. Chikwanha","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2022.2037004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although Africa has made some progress in the last two decades, the continent still faces development challenges: the persistence of poverty, unemployment, and inequality. The continent still depends to a large extent on commodities in terms of production and exports, and it imports the bulk of its manufactured goods. Thus, there has been little progress on structural transformation. Dependence on donor financing remains high. Relative to other regions, Africa ranks lowest on many development indicators. This article has two objectives: to assess the nature and practice of African agency and to analyse its effectiveness in shaping, nurturing, and promoting the kind of development that is defined in the African Union's Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Agenda 2063 presents a vision of development that is people-driven, people-owned, participatory, and self-reliant. Although the AU has made progress in creating institutional governance architecture and a continental development framework to guide its member states, its “Africanness” and effectiveness as an agency for development seems limited. We attribute this to the limited nature of participation and engagement of broader African society in the decision-making processes and in the programme initiatives that are aimed to achieve the goals of Agenda 2063.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2022.2037004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although Africa has made some progress in the last two decades, the continent still faces development challenges: the persistence of poverty, unemployment, and inequality. The continent still depends to a large extent on commodities in terms of production and exports, and it imports the bulk of its manufactured goods. Thus, there has been little progress on structural transformation. Dependence on donor financing remains high. Relative to other regions, Africa ranks lowest on many development indicators. This article has two objectives: to assess the nature and practice of African agency and to analyse its effectiveness in shaping, nurturing, and promoting the kind of development that is defined in the African Union's Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Agenda 2063 presents a vision of development that is people-driven, people-owned, participatory, and self-reliant. Although the AU has made progress in creating institutional governance architecture and a continental development framework to guide its member states, its “Africanness” and effectiveness as an agency for development seems limited. We attribute this to the limited nature of participation and engagement of broader African society in the decision-making processes and in the programme initiatives that are aimed to achieve the goals of Agenda 2063.
非洲开发署:全球化时代的进步、矛盾和复杂性
尽管非洲在过去二十年中取得了一些进步,但非洲大陆仍然面临着发展挑战:持续存在的贫困、失业和不平等。非洲大陆在生产和出口方面仍然在很大程度上依赖于商品,它的大部分制成品都是进口的。因此,在结构转型方面几乎没有进展。对捐助资金的依赖程度仍然很高。与其他区域相比,非洲在许多发展指标上排名最低。本文有两个目的:评估非洲机构的性质和实践,并分析其在塑造、培育和促进非盟《2063年议程:我们想要的非洲》中所定义的那种发展方面的有效性。《2063年议程》提出了人民驱动、人民拥有、人民参与、人民自力更生的发展理念。尽管非盟在创建机构治理架构和大陆发展框架以指导其成员国方面取得了进展,但其“非洲性”和作为发展机构的有效性似乎有限。我们将其归因于更广泛的非洲社会在决策进程和旨在实现《2063年议程》目标的方案倡议中的参与和参与有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信