A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE FRAMING OF POLITICS IN JORDANIAN ONLINE NEWS

Hamzeh Mohammad Almomani Mohammad, Yoke Ling Loh
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE FRAMING OF POLITICS IN JORDANIAN ONLINE NEWS","authors":"Hamzeh Mohammad Almomani Mohammad, Yoke Ling Loh","doi":"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2002.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"News bias has a detrimental impact on how the general public and specific individuals perceive the news information, resulting in a significant impact on Jordanian politics. Mainstream media sources continue to be the main sources of information about current events in Jordan, despite the internet's many advancements in the domains of communication. The widespread usage of news polarisation and the interference of the government through laws and policies are two additional reasons why it is regarded as good journalism in Jordan. Through a descriptive and comparative content analysis, this research applies theoretical fieldwork of communication and aims to comprehend and assess how the Al Hamzeh issue was framed in the Jordanian online news agencies, Al Ghad and Al Rai. The results of this study show that the official online news agency Al Rai gave more attention in its coverage of the Al Hamzeh issue than the independent online news Al Ghad. Al Ghad and Al Rai news pieces extensively implement the five different types of news frames in both their headlines and body copy. Additionally, the wording employed in the chosen news stories had a strong slant. The outcome regarding the independent news agency, Al Ghad, interpret contradiction anent news independence in Jordan. This study advances development of knowledge in the areas of press freedom, foreign policy, and communication. This study clarifies the understanding of Jordan's media landscape.","PeriodicalId":133740,"journal":{"name":"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Bangi Journal of Social Science and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2002.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

News bias has a detrimental impact on how the general public and specific individuals perceive the news information, resulting in a significant impact on Jordanian politics. Mainstream media sources continue to be the main sources of information about current events in Jordan, despite the internet's many advancements in the domains of communication. The widespread usage of news polarisation and the interference of the government through laws and policies are two additional reasons why it is regarded as good journalism in Jordan. Through a descriptive and comparative content analysis, this research applies theoretical fieldwork of communication and aims to comprehend and assess how the Al Hamzeh issue was framed in the Jordanian online news agencies, Al Ghad and Al Rai. The results of this study show that the official online news agency Al Rai gave more attention in its coverage of the Al Hamzeh issue than the independent online news Al Ghad. Al Ghad and Al Rai news pieces extensively implement the five different types of news frames in both their headlines and body copy. Additionally, the wording employed in the chosen news stories had a strong slant. The outcome regarding the independent news agency, Al Ghad, interpret contradiction anent news independence in Jordan. This study advances development of knowledge in the areas of press freedom, foreign policy, and communication. This study clarifies the understanding of Jordan's media landscape.
约旦网络新闻中政治框架的比较分析
新闻偏见对一般公众和特定个人如何感知新闻信息产生不利影响,从而对约旦政治产生重大影响。主流媒体仍然是约旦时事资讯的主要来源,尽管互联网在通讯领域有许多进步。新闻两极分化的广泛使用,以及政府通过法律和政策的干预,是它在约旦被视为好新闻的另外两个原因。通过描述性和比较性的内容分析,本研究运用传播学的理论实地考察,旨在理解和评估Al Hamzeh问题是如何在约旦在线新闻机构Al Ghad和Al Rai中形成的。这项研究的结果表明,官方的在线新闻机构Al Rai在报道Al Hamzeh问题时比独立的在线新闻Al Ghad给予更多的关注。Al Ghad和Al Rai的新闻在标题和正文中广泛地采用了这五种不同类型的新闻框架。此外,所选新闻报道中使用的措辞具有强烈的倾向性。关于独立通讯社Al Ghad的结果,解释了约旦新闻独立的矛盾。这项研究促进了新闻自由、外交政策和传播领域知识的发展。这项研究澄清了对约旦媒体格局的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信