Development of Metacognition Awareness Scale for 10th–12th Grade

Edmunds Vanags, P. Pestovs
{"title":"Development of Metacognition Awareness Scale for 10th–12th Grade","authors":"Edmunds Vanags, P. Pestovs","doi":"10.22364/atee.2019.itre.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the goals of the Latvian National Development Plan is to reduce the proportion of students with low cognitive skills, and at the same time increase the proportion of students with high level cognitive skills by the year 2020. In line with this goal, National Centre for Education has initiated a curriculum and educational assessment system reform. It is important to create assessment instruments for both: subject specific content and 21st century skills, which are integrated in the learning outcomes in the revised curriculum. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a new metacognitive awareness scale for 10–12 grade pupils. The instrument was based on the structure of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw, & Sperling, 1994), creating new items and making them specific to the content of national level large-scale assessment in Science. A total of 1,257 pupils (48.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged M = 15.30 (SD = 0.53) participated in the study. To find out the pupils’ metacognitive awareness factors, 35 statements about different metacognitive activities were developed. Factor analysis showed good structure of 3 factors – planning, monitoring, and evaluation, but weak structure of other possible factors. Internal consistency of the overall scale was good (α = 0.92). Discrimination and difficulty index levels meet accepted psychometric criteria. After multiple iterations, confirmatory factorial analysis revealed that 9-item model had good fit and good structure of three components: planning, monitoring, and evaluation.","PeriodicalId":288422,"journal":{"name":"Innovations, Technologies and Research in Education, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations, Technologies and Research in Education, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2019.itre.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the goals of the Latvian National Development Plan is to reduce the proportion of students with low cognitive skills, and at the same time increase the proportion of students with high level cognitive skills by the year 2020. In line with this goal, National Centre for Education has initiated a curriculum and educational assessment system reform. It is important to create assessment instruments for both: subject specific content and 21st century skills, which are integrated in the learning outcomes in the revised curriculum. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a new metacognitive awareness scale for 10–12 grade pupils. The instrument was based on the structure of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Schraw, & Sperling, 1994), creating new items and making them specific to the content of national level large-scale assessment in Science. A total of 1,257 pupils (48.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged M = 15.30 (SD = 0.53) participated in the study. To find out the pupils’ metacognitive awareness factors, 35 statements about different metacognitive activities were developed. Factor analysis showed good structure of 3 factors – planning, monitoring, and evaluation, but weak structure of other possible factors. Internal consistency of the overall scale was good (α = 0.92). Discrimination and difficulty index levels meet accepted psychometric criteria. After multiple iterations, confirmatory factorial analysis revealed that 9-item model had good fit and good structure of three components: planning, monitoring, and evaluation.
10 - 12年级元认知意识量表的编制
拉脱维亚国家发展计划的目标之一是到2020年减少低认知技能学生的比例,同时增加高水平认知技能学生的比例。为了实现这一目标,国家教育中心开始了一项课程和教育评价制度改革。重要的是为特定学科的内容和21世纪的技能创建评估工具,并将其整合到修订后课程的学习成果中。本研究的目的是开发和试点一种新的元认知意识量表,适用于10-12年级的小学生。该工具以元认知意识量表(Schraw, & Sperling, 1994)的结构为基础,创造了新的项目,并使其具体到《科学》中国家级大规模评估的内容。共1257名年龄M = 15.30 (SD = 0.53)的小学生(男生48.4%,女生51.6%)参与研究。为了解小学生元认知意识因素,编制了35份不同元认知活动的陈述。因子分析显示,规划、监测、评价3个因子结构较好,其他可能因子结构较弱。整体量表内部一致性较好(α = 0.92)。辨别和困难指数水平符合公认的心理测量标准。经过多次迭代,验证性因子分析表明,9项模型具有较好的拟合性和良好的计划、监测和评估三个组成部分的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信