Knowledge tools for UN peace-keeping: developing the global watch

W. Dorn
{"title":"Knowledge tools for UN peace-keeping: developing the global watch","authors":"W. Dorn","doi":"10.1109/KTSC.1995.569157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. The UN needs reliable and up-to-date knowledge of events in order to prevent conflicts and maintain peace. However, there are severe political limitations on the ability of the UN to gather and analyse information. UN fact-finding, particularly if it involves the passive collection of information from open sources is the mildest of interventions. It is useful to examine the limitations and powers of UN fact-finding bodies in the past, the present and the future. What methods of observation can be permitted under what circumstances? What is the extent to which data can be interpreted by the UN Secretary-General and other bodies of the UN? This paper examines these issues using the rich history of UN fact-finding spanning fifty years with a view to the future.","PeriodicalId":283614,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given. The UN needs reliable and up-to-date knowledge of events in order to prevent conflicts and maintain peace. However, there are severe political limitations on the ability of the UN to gather and analyse information. UN fact-finding, particularly if it involves the passive collection of information from open sources is the mildest of interventions. It is useful to examine the limitations and powers of UN fact-finding bodies in the past, the present and the future. What methods of observation can be permitted under what circumstances? What is the extent to which data can be interpreted by the UN Secretary-General and other bodies of the UN? This paper examines these issues using the rich history of UN fact-finding spanning fifty years with a view to the future.
联合国维持和平的知识工具:发展全球观察
只提供摘要形式。联合国需要可靠和最新的事件知识,以防止冲突和维护和平。然而,联合国收集和分析信息的能力受到严重的政治限制。联合国实况调查是最温和的干预措施,特别是如果它涉及从公开来源被动收集信息。审视联合国实况调查机构在过去、现在和未来的局限性和权力是有益的。在什么情况下可以允许使用什么观察方法?联合国秘书长和联合国其他机构在多大程度上可以解释数据?本文利用联合国五十年来丰富的实况调查历史,着眼于未来,对这些问题进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信