Nurses’ knowledge of Diagnostic-Therapeutic Care Pathways (DTCP): A cross-sectional study

Nsc Nursing Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.32549/opi-nsc-75
Ubaldi Ubaldino, Valentina Accinno, Margherita Ascione, Concetta Pane
{"title":"Nurses’ knowledge of Diagnostic-Therapeutic Care Pathways (DTCP): A cross-sectional study","authors":"Ubaldi Ubaldino, Valentina Accinno, Margherita Ascione, Concetta Pane","doi":"10.32549/opi-nsc-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Management by processes and clinical care pathways are now fundamental and indispensable requirements for quality improvement in healthcare organisations. The basic idea is to design a system that allows for continuous improvement in the way in which the key player in healthcare, i.e. the patient, is managed. If this were to happen, the best experiences to date tell us, it would definitively improve outcomes, efficiency and appropriateness. Moreover, patients perceive and appreciate this difference, allowing health professionals to operate at their best. Objective: To assess the knowledge and application of the DTCPs by the nursing staff. Materials and methods: The cross-sectional study took place in the period between June and September 2019 at the Operative Units of digestive surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, breast surgery and gynaecological surgery of the “Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS in Rome”. A questionnaire was administered only to permanent nurses. Results: A total of 64 questionnaires were administered of which 27 were correctly completed (response rate 42.1%) and considered valid for analysis. The sample of respondents was predominantly female (74.07%), 81.48% held a Bachelor's degree and 40.74% held a Master's degree. 55.56% knew what DTCPs were, but there was no in-depth knowledge of them in the sample. In fact, 55.56% knew whether there were active DTCPs in their region; 7.41% that nurses cannot participate in DTCPs and only 11.11% that nurses cannot participate in the review of individual DTCPs, while 59.26% were aware of the professional figures involved in the drafting and review of DTCPs. 25.93% knew what the diagnostic phase was based on and 14.81% that there were no active memoranda of understanding with public or private facilities in the diagnostic phase. Finally, only 25.93% were aware that the user could not be used in the evaluation of the outcome. Conclusions: Although the interviewees were familiar with clinical care pathways, for most of them there had never been active involvement, they agreed on user involvement instead. Keywords: nursing care, clinical care pathways, patient safety, diagnostic-therapeutic care pathways","PeriodicalId":387300,"journal":{"name":"Nsc Nursing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nsc Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32549/opi-nsc-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Management by processes and clinical care pathways are now fundamental and indispensable requirements for quality improvement in healthcare organisations. The basic idea is to design a system that allows for continuous improvement in the way in which the key player in healthcare, i.e. the patient, is managed. If this were to happen, the best experiences to date tell us, it would definitively improve outcomes, efficiency and appropriateness. Moreover, patients perceive and appreciate this difference, allowing health professionals to operate at their best. Objective: To assess the knowledge and application of the DTCPs by the nursing staff. Materials and methods: The cross-sectional study took place in the period between June and September 2019 at the Operative Units of digestive surgery, hepatobiliary surgery, breast surgery and gynaecological surgery of the “Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS in Rome”. A questionnaire was administered only to permanent nurses. Results: A total of 64 questionnaires were administered of which 27 were correctly completed (response rate 42.1%) and considered valid for analysis. The sample of respondents was predominantly female (74.07%), 81.48% held a Bachelor's degree and 40.74% held a Master's degree. 55.56% knew what DTCPs were, but there was no in-depth knowledge of them in the sample. In fact, 55.56% knew whether there were active DTCPs in their region; 7.41% that nurses cannot participate in DTCPs and only 11.11% that nurses cannot participate in the review of individual DTCPs, while 59.26% were aware of the professional figures involved in the drafting and review of DTCPs. 25.93% knew what the diagnostic phase was based on and 14.81% that there were no active memoranda of understanding with public or private facilities in the diagnostic phase. Finally, only 25.93% were aware that the user could not be used in the evaluation of the outcome. Conclusions: Although the interviewees were familiar with clinical care pathways, for most of them there had never been active involvement, they agreed on user involvement instead. Keywords: nursing care, clinical care pathways, patient safety, diagnostic-therapeutic care pathways
护士对诊断-治疗护理途径(DTCP)知识的横断面研究
简介:管理的过程和临床护理途径现在是基本的和不可缺少的要求,质量提高在医疗保健组织。基本思想是设计一个系统,允许持续改进医疗保健中的关键参与者(即患者)的管理方式。迄今为止最好的经验告诉我们,如果这种情况发生,它肯定会改善结果、效率和适当性。此外,患者感知并欣赏这种差异,使卫生专业人员能够以最佳状态进行操作。目的:了解护理人员对DTCPs的知识和应用情况。材料和方法:该横断面研究于2019年6月至9月期间在“罗马基金会polilinico Gemelli IRCCS”的消化外科、肝胆外科、乳房外科和妇科外科手术单元进行。问卷调查只对长期护士进行。结果:共发放问卷64份,正确填写问卷27份,答复率42.1%,认为可以进行有效分析。受访者样本以女性为主(74.07%),81.48%的受访者拥有本科学历,40.74%的受访者拥有硕士学位。55.56%的人知道dtcp是什么,但在样本中没有深入的了解。事实上,55.56%的人知道他们所在地区是否有活跃的dtcp;7.41%的护士不能参与DTCPs,仅有11.11%的护士不能参与个别DTCPs的评审,而59.26%的护士知道DTCPs的起草和评审所涉及的专业数字。25.93%的人知道诊断阶段的依据,14.81%的人在诊断阶段没有与公立或私立机构签订积极的谅解备忘录。最后,只有25.93%的人意识到用户不能用于评价结果。结论:虽然受访者熟悉临床护理路径,但大多数人从未积极参与,他们同意用户参与。关键词:护理,临床护理路径,患者安全,诊疗护理路径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信