The Dark Side of the Model

J. Fisher
{"title":"The Dark Side of the Model","authors":"J. Fisher","doi":"10.18574/NYU/9781479877997.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinic practices that make healthy volunteers into model organisms also raise important validity concerns about Phase I trials. Chapter 6 concentrates particularly on the ways in which healthy volunteers, clinics, and the pharmaceutical industry all have incentives to make investigational drugs appear safer than they really might be. The chapter considers intrinsic validity concerns, extrinsic validity concerns, and adverse event reporting as a validity calamity. Intrinsic concerns have to do with the sex, race/ethnicity, age, and seriality of healthy volunteers and raise the question of whether and to what extent healthy volunteers can be considered representative of the general population. Extrinsic concerns include staff and healthy volunteer practices, such as treating the inclusion-exclusion criteria for studies as more malleable than intended or failing to adhere to or enforce the waiting period before healthy volunteers can enroll in their next study. The chapter concludes with a treatment of adverse event reporting as an in-depth case of validity problems that emerge in clinical trials when all the actors have an economic interest in underreporting any symptoms that occur in healthy volunteers during these studies.","PeriodicalId":216911,"journal":{"name":"Adverse Events","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adverse Events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479877997.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinic practices that make healthy volunteers into model organisms also raise important validity concerns about Phase I trials. Chapter 6 concentrates particularly on the ways in which healthy volunteers, clinics, and the pharmaceutical industry all have incentives to make investigational drugs appear safer than they really might be. The chapter considers intrinsic validity concerns, extrinsic validity concerns, and adverse event reporting as a validity calamity. Intrinsic concerns have to do with the sex, race/ethnicity, age, and seriality of healthy volunteers and raise the question of whether and to what extent healthy volunteers can be considered representative of the general population. Extrinsic concerns include staff and healthy volunteer practices, such as treating the inclusion-exclusion criteria for studies as more malleable than intended or failing to adhere to or enforce the waiting period before healthy volunteers can enroll in their next study. The chapter concludes with a treatment of adverse event reporting as an in-depth case of validity problems that emerge in clinical trials when all the actors have an economic interest in underreporting any symptoms that occur in healthy volunteers during these studies.
模型的阴暗面
将健康志愿者变成模式生物的临床实践也引起了对第一阶段试验有效性的重要关注。第六章特别关注健康的志愿者、诊所和制药行业都有动机使研究用药物看起来比实际更安全的方式。本章考虑了内在效度关注、外在效度关注和不良事件报告作为效度灾难。内在的关注与健康志愿者的性别、种族/民族、年龄和连续性有关,并提出了健康志愿者是否以及在多大程度上可以被认为代表一般人口的问题。外部问题包括工作人员和健康志愿者的做法,例如将研究的纳入-排除标准视为比预期更具可塑性,或者未能坚持或强制执行健康志愿者参加下一个研究之前的等待期。本章总结了不良事件报告的处理,作为临床试验中出现的有效性问题的深入案例,当所有参与者在这些研究中少报健康志愿者出现的任何症状时都有经济利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信