A classification of autonomous bilateral cloud SLA negotiation strategies

Benedikt Pittl, W. Mach, E. Schikuta
{"title":"A classification of autonomous bilateral cloud SLA negotiation strategies","authors":"Benedikt Pittl, W. Mach, E. Schikuta","doi":"10.1145/3011141.3011159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently digital markets emerge where cloud resources are traded in the form of computational services. Usually the so called supermarket approach is applied on these service markets, where consumers buy offered services from providers based on fixed functional and non-functional characteristics without negotiations. However, bilateral multi round negotiation, which allows to customize the traded services, is considered as a promising improvement to the static supermarket approach aiming for higher market efficiency. In this paper we introduce a novel generic service market ecosystem from which requirements for bilateral negotiation strategies are derived. Evaluating a survey on published bilateral negotiation strategies along these requirements shows that important market elements are not considered in current research. Most of the published bilateral negotiation strategies are focusing on a single negotiation phases only neglecting the complete negotiation process. Hence we classify the identified strategies along the different phases of the generic negotiation process. Based on our analysis we identify two different groups in their scientific approach: One group assumes complete information during bilateral negotiations while the other group assumes incomplete information.","PeriodicalId":247823,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3011141.3011159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Currently digital markets emerge where cloud resources are traded in the form of computational services. Usually the so called supermarket approach is applied on these service markets, where consumers buy offered services from providers based on fixed functional and non-functional characteristics without negotiations. However, bilateral multi round negotiation, which allows to customize the traded services, is considered as a promising improvement to the static supermarket approach aiming for higher market efficiency. In this paper we introduce a novel generic service market ecosystem from which requirements for bilateral negotiation strategies are derived. Evaluating a survey on published bilateral negotiation strategies along these requirements shows that important market elements are not considered in current research. Most of the published bilateral negotiation strategies are focusing on a single negotiation phases only neglecting the complete negotiation process. Hence we classify the identified strategies along the different phases of the generic negotiation process. Based on our analysis we identify two different groups in their scientific approach: One group assumes complete information during bilateral negotiations while the other group assumes incomplete information.
自主双边云SLA协商策略的分类
目前,在以计算服务的形式交易云资源的数字市场中出现了。这些服务市场通常采用所谓的超市方式,消费者根据固定的功能和非功能特征从供应商那里购买所提供的服务,而无需协商。然而,允许定制交易服务的双边多轮谈判被认为是对静态超市方式的一种有希望的改进,旨在提高市场效率。本文引入了一种新的通用服务市场生态系统,并由此导出了双边谈判策略的需求。根据这些要求对已公布的双边谈判战略进行的调查表明,目前的研究没有考虑到重要的市场因素。现有的双边谈判策略大多侧重于某一谈判阶段,而忽视了整个谈判过程。因此,我们沿着通用谈判过程的不同阶段对已确定的策略进行分类。根据我们的分析,我们确定了两组不同的科学方法:一组在双边谈判中假设信息完整,而另一组假设信息不完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信