PEMULIHAN ASET KORBAN PENIPUAN SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA ASAL DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

Andreanto, M. A. Amrullah, Fanny Tanuwijaya
{"title":"PEMULIHAN ASET KORBAN PENIPUAN SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA ASAL DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG","authors":"Andreanto, M. A. Amrullah, Fanny Tanuwijaya","doi":"10.55809/tora.v9i2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In a criminal offense we need to know clearly the criminal offense that occurred is a must. One of them is the crime of embezzlement formulated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which means that embezzlement is an act in which an object is in the power of a person not because of a criminal offense, but because of a legal act, for example because of storage, entrustment agreements, and so on. Then the person who is given the trust to store and so on controls the goods for himself unlawfully, then the person is committing embezzlement. In contrast to fraud as formulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code, fraud means an act with the intent to unlawfully benefit oneself or others by using a false name, false dignity, deception or lies that can cause others to easily surrender their goods, money or wealth. These two criminal offenses can result in other actions that harm others with economic motives, which can be said that fraud and embezzlement are carried out to obtain a person's assets, one of which can be obtained by money laundering. Assets themselves are goods which in the legal sense are movable objects, both tangible and intangible, which are included in the assets or wealth or property of an agency, business entity organization or individual. The anti-money laundering regime in Indonesia has given birth to a new approach that no longer focuses on the perpetrators of crime, but on the assets of the proceeds of crime, known as the follow the money method. In addition, the law enforcement instruments against illegal assets contained in the Anti-Money Laundering Law are actually sufficient to reach not only the assets resulting from criminal acts but also their acquisition. Ideally, the assets resulting from the criminal offense are returned to the victim of the criminal offense through a court decision with permanent legal force that orders the seizure of assets for the state or returns to the rightful owner. Returning assets to victims by perpetrators in cases of property crime, fraud and embezzlement is not impossible. Return of assets in the form of compensation in this case can be implemented by merging cases. Victims of crimes with material losses, such as fraud and embezzlement, have the right to recover their property.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In a criminal offense we need to know clearly the criminal offense that occurred is a must. One of them is the crime of embezzlement formulated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which means that embezzlement is an act in which an object is in the power of a person not because of a criminal offense, but because of a legal act, for example because of storage, entrustment agreements, and so on. Then the person who is given the trust to store and so on controls the goods for himself unlawfully, then the person is committing embezzlement. In contrast to fraud as formulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code, fraud means an act with the intent to unlawfully benefit oneself or others by using a false name, false dignity, deception or lies that can cause others to easily surrender their goods, money or wealth. These two criminal offenses can result in other actions that harm others with economic motives, which can be said that fraud and embezzlement are carried out to obtain a person's assets, one of which can be obtained by money laundering. Assets themselves are goods which in the legal sense are movable objects, both tangible and intangible, which are included in the assets or wealth or property of an agency, business entity organization or individual. The anti-money laundering regime in Indonesia has given birth to a new approach that no longer focuses on the perpetrators of crime, but on the assets of the proceeds of crime, known as the follow the money method. In addition, the law enforcement instruments against illegal assets contained in the Anti-Money Laundering Law are actually sufficient to reach not only the assets resulting from criminal acts but also their acquisition. Ideally, the assets resulting from the criminal offense are returned to the victim of the criminal offense through a court decision with permanent legal force that orders the seizure of assets for the state or returns to the rightful owner. Returning assets to victims by perpetrators in cases of property crime, fraud and embezzlement is not impossible. Return of assets in the form of compensation in this case can be implemented by merging cases. Victims of crimes with material losses, such as fraud and embezzlement, have the right to recover their property.
回收被诈骗受害者的资产作为洗钱行为的基础
在刑事犯罪中,我们需要清楚地知道所发生的刑事犯罪是必须的。其中之一是《刑法》第372条规定的贪赃罪,意思是说,贪赃是一种行为,在这种行为中,一件物品不是由于刑事犯罪,而是由于法律行为,例如由于保管、委托协议等,而处于某人的权力之下。然后,被委托储存的人非法控制了货物,那么这个人就犯了侵占罪。与刑法第378条所规定的欺诈不同,欺诈是指利用虚假的姓名、虚假的尊严、欺骗或谎言,使他人轻易交出其货物、金钱或财富,意图非法地为自己或他人谋取利益的行为。这两种刑事犯罪可以导致其他具有经济动机的伤害他人的行为,可以说是为了获得一个人的资产而进行欺诈和挪用,其中一种可以通过洗钱获得。资产本身是货物,在法律意义上是有形和无形的可移动物体,包括在机构,商业实体,组织或个人的资产或财富或财产中。印度尼西亚的反洗钱制度催生了一种新的方法,不再把重点放在犯罪的肇事者身上,而是放在犯罪所得的资产上,即所谓的追踪钱的方法。此外,《反洗钱法》所规定的针对非法资产的执法手段,实际上不仅适用于犯罪行为产生的资产,也适用于犯罪行为取得的资产。理想的情况是,通过具有永久法律效力的法院判决,将犯罪行为造成的资产返还给犯罪行为的受害者,该判决命令为国家扣押资产或返还给合法所有者。在财产犯罪、欺诈和贪污案件中,犯罪者将财产返还给受害者并非不可能。在这种情况下,以补偿的形式返还资产可以通过合并案例来实现。诈骗、挪用公款等重大损失犯罪的受害人有权追讨财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信