The Possibility of Problematizing Parent Education in Contrast to Teacher Education: The Legacy of the Modern Civil Class and the Desire of Parents

S. Cho, Juhwan Kim, Jong-Bae Park, Cho-Arm Yoon
{"title":"The Possibility of Problematizing Parent Education in Contrast to Teacher Education: The Legacy of the Modern Civil Class and the Desire of Parents","authors":"S. Cho, Juhwan Kim, Jong-Bae Park, Cho-Arm Yoon","doi":"10.26894/kdge.2022.27.3.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the aspects of parent education, a category of adult education emerging as an extension of education, that can be problematized or thematized at a different level from teacher education. In the conventional conception of education that we know, parents are the same category as teachers, who are on the opposite side of the growing generation. Parent education sets the goal of educating parents with the goal of nurturing children. Although teacher education appears to be conceptually similar to parent education, the existential situations of parents and teachers as learners are different, which is a crucial point where parent education can be problematic. From the moment they have children, parents experience life as a different being from teachers. Parents who have children, are in a qualitatively different ontological position from teachers who take a ‘neutral’ stance on learners. In this study, the decisive basis for parent education to be problematic was found in the historical and social approach to the perspective and behavior of modern Western civic education. Then various perspectives on parent education were dealt with in that the goals of parent education and the desires of parents as learners were in a conflicting relationship with each other. To this end, a critical analysis was conducted focusing on the discourse on liberal arts education in the humanities, Freud and Lacan’s criticism of desire, and Deleuze’s analysis of desire.","PeriodicalId":236566,"journal":{"name":"Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Erziehungswissenschaft","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Erziehungswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26894/kdge.2022.27.3.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the aspects of parent education, a category of adult education emerging as an extension of education, that can be problematized or thematized at a different level from teacher education. In the conventional conception of education that we know, parents are the same category as teachers, who are on the opposite side of the growing generation. Parent education sets the goal of educating parents with the goal of nurturing children. Although teacher education appears to be conceptually similar to parent education, the existential situations of parents and teachers as learners are different, which is a crucial point where parent education can be problematic. From the moment they have children, parents experience life as a different being from teachers. Parents who have children, are in a qualitatively different ontological position from teachers who take a ‘neutral’ stance on learners. In this study, the decisive basis for parent education to be problematic was found in the historical and social approach to the perspective and behavior of modern Western civic education. Then various perspectives on parent education were dealt with in that the goals of parent education and the desires of parents as learners were in a conflicting relationship with each other. To this end, a critical analysis was conducted focusing on the discourse on liberal arts education in the humanities, Freud and Lacan’s criticism of desire, and Deleuze’s analysis of desire.
与教师教育相比,父母教育问题化的可能性:现代公民阶级的遗产与父母的愿望
本研究考察了父母教育的各个方面,这是作为教育的延伸而出现的成人教育的一个类别,可以在不同于教师教育的层面上进行问题化或主题化。在我们所知道的传统的教育观念中,父母和老师是一类人,他们处于成长一代的对立面。家长教育以培养孩子为目标,以教育家长为目标。虽然教师教育在概念上似乎与家长教育相似,但家长和教师作为学习者的存在情况是不同的,这是家长教育可能出现问题的关键所在。从他们有孩子的那一刻起,父母就以不同于教师的身份体验生活。有孩子的父母与对学习者持“中立”态度的教师在本体论上的立场在本质上是不同的。在本研究中,父母教育出现问题的决定性依据是对现代西方公民教育的视角和行为的历史和社会方法。然后论述了家长教育的各种观点,认为家长教育的目标和家长作为学习者的愿望是相互冲突的关系。为此,本文着重对人文学科的博雅教育论述、弗洛伊德和拉康对欲望的批判以及德勒兹对欲望的分析进行了批判性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信