Metafilozoficzny charakter Jaspersa kategorii „ogarniającego”

M. Urbanek
{"title":"Metafilozoficzny charakter Jaspersa kategorii „ogarniającego”","authors":"M. Urbanek","doi":"10.24917/9788380846616.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I would like to show that Jaspers’ concept of “encompassing” may be regarded as metaphilosophical. The term itself embodies notion of philosophy as fundamentally nonlinear, existential and perpetually open (philosophiae perennis) kind of thinking which structure (described as dialec- tic relation between “what encompasses” and “what is encompassed”) should be regarded as basic form of every source enlightenment. If philosophy aims for that goal, then Jaspers’ periechontology (as analysis of different modes of encompassing) shows us that it can not be realised by any direct insight – by grasping any specific content of cognition. The sole and only way for philos- ophy to reach what is truly transcendent is to inquire the relation between “what is encompassed” and “what encompasses” as a ground on which every subject-object reality is founded. In this paper I would like to show that Jaspers’ concept of “encompass- ing” may be regarded as metaphilosophical. The term itself embodies notion of philosophy as fundamentally nonlinear, existential and perpetually open (philosophiae perennis) kind of thinking which structure (described as dialec- tic relation between “what encompasses” and “what is encompassed”) should be regarded as basic form of every source enlightenment. If philosophy aims for that goal, then Jaspers’ periechontology (as analysis of different modes of encompassing) shows us that it can not be realised by any direct insight – by grasping any specific content of cognition. The sole and only way for philos- ophy to reach what is truly transcendent is to inquire the relation between “what is encompassed” and “what encompasses” as a ground on which every subject-object reality is founded.","PeriodicalId":313262,"journal":{"name":"Karl Jaspers. Filozofia wieczysta - filozofia czasu","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karl Jaspers. Filozofia wieczysta - filozofia czasu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/9788380846616.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I would like to show that Jaspers’ concept of “encompassing” may be regarded as metaphilosophical. The term itself embodies notion of philosophy as fundamentally nonlinear, existential and perpetually open (philosophiae perennis) kind of thinking which structure (described as dialec- tic relation between “what encompasses” and “what is encompassed”) should be regarded as basic form of every source enlightenment. If philosophy aims for that goal, then Jaspers’ periechontology (as analysis of different modes of encompassing) shows us that it can not be realised by any direct insight – by grasping any specific content of cognition. The sole and only way for philos- ophy to reach what is truly transcendent is to inquire the relation between “what is encompassed” and “what encompasses” as a ground on which every subject-object reality is founded. In this paper I would like to show that Jaspers’ concept of “encompass- ing” may be regarded as metaphilosophical. The term itself embodies notion of philosophy as fundamentally nonlinear, existential and perpetually open (philosophiae perennis) kind of thinking which structure (described as dialec- tic relation between “what encompasses” and “what is encompassed”) should be regarded as basic form of every source enlightenment. If philosophy aims for that goal, then Jaspers’ periechontology (as analysis of different modes of encompassing) shows us that it can not be realised by any direct insight – by grasping any specific content of cognition. The sole and only way for philos- ophy to reach what is truly transcendent is to inquire the relation between “what is encompassed” and “what encompasses” as a ground on which every subject-object reality is founded.
在本文中,我想表明雅斯贝尔斯的“包容”概念可以被视为形而上学的。这个术语本身体现了哲学的概念,即哲学本质上是非线性的、存在的和永远开放的(philosophiae perennis)思维,这种思维结构(描述为“包含什么”和“被包含什么”之间的辩证关系)应该被视为每一个源头启蒙的基本形式。如果哲学的目标是实现这一目标,那么雅斯贝尔斯的圆周论(作为对不同的包含模式的分析)告诉我们,它不能通过任何直接的洞察力来实现——通过掌握任何特定的认知内容。哲学要达到真正的超越性,唯一的途径就是探究“被包围的东西”和“被包围的东西”之间的关系,并以此作为每一个主客体实在的基础。在本文中,我想表明雅斯贝尔斯的“包含”概念可以被视为形而上学的。这个术语本身体现了哲学的概念,即哲学本质上是非线性的、存在的和永远开放的(philosophiae perennis)思维,这种思维结构(描述为“包含什么”和“被包含什么”之间的辩证关系)应该被视为每一个源头启蒙的基本形式。如果哲学的目标是实现这一目标,那么雅斯贝尔斯的圆周论(作为对不同的包含模式的分析)告诉我们,它不能通过任何直接的洞察力来实现——通过掌握任何特定的认知内容。哲学要达到真正的超越性,唯一的途径就是探究“被包围的东西”和“被包围的东西”之间的关系,并以此作为每一个主客体实在的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信