Challenges in chart image classification: a comparative study of different deep learning methods

Jennil Thiyam, Sanasam Ranbir Singh, P. Bora
{"title":"Challenges in chart image classification: a comparative study of different deep learning methods","authors":"Jennil Thiyam, Sanasam Ranbir Singh, P. Bora","doi":"10.1145/3469096.3474931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charts are commonly used forms of visualizing scientific observations from research findings or commercial trends. They provide an abstraction of the underlying information in a more understandable way. Over time, different forms of charts are developed. With the increase in the number of scientific documents present on the internet with different types of charts, automatic chart classification is becoming an important task for various applications. There have been several studies on chart classification with methods ranging from traditional machine learning approaches like SVM, KNN, and HMM to recent deep learning models like VGG, ResNet, and Xception. However, inconsistencies in experimental results are evident. This paper evaluates nine of the recently proposed deep learning-based models on three datasets (one curated and annotated by authors, and two publicly available), and systematically studies their performances over various setups to understand the reason for observing inconsistent results.","PeriodicalId":423462,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3469096.3474931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Charts are commonly used forms of visualizing scientific observations from research findings or commercial trends. They provide an abstraction of the underlying information in a more understandable way. Over time, different forms of charts are developed. With the increase in the number of scientific documents present on the internet with different types of charts, automatic chart classification is becoming an important task for various applications. There have been several studies on chart classification with methods ranging from traditional machine learning approaches like SVM, KNN, and HMM to recent deep learning models like VGG, ResNet, and Xception. However, inconsistencies in experimental results are evident. This paper evaluates nine of the recently proposed deep learning-based models on three datasets (one curated and annotated by authors, and two publicly available), and systematically studies their performances over various setups to understand the reason for observing inconsistent results.
图表图像分类的挑战:不同深度学习方法的比较研究
图表是将研究结果或商业趋势的科学观察结果可视化的常用形式。它们以一种更容易理解的方式提供了底层信息的抽象。随着时间的推移,不同形式的图表被开发出来。随着互联网上各种图表类型的科学文献数量的增加,图表自动分类正成为各种应用的重要任务。从传统的机器学习方法(如SVM、KNN和HMM)到最近的深度学习模型(如VGG、ResNet和Xception),已经有一些关于图表分类的研究。然而,实验结果的不一致性是显而易见的。本文在三个数据集(一个由作者策划和注释,两个公开可用)上评估了最近提出的九个基于深度学习的模型,并系统地研究了它们在各种设置下的性能,以了解观察到不一致结果的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信