The Evolution of Defense in Depth Approach: A Cross Sectorial Analysis

Lorenzo Chierici, G. Fiorini, S. Rovere, P. Vestrucci
{"title":"The Evolution of Defense in Depth Approach: A Cross Sectorial Analysis","authors":"Lorenzo Chierici, G. Fiorini, S. Rovere, P. Vestrucci","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2016.62004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Defense in Depth (DiD) is a classical defensive concept currently applied to a variety of technical fields, including nuclear (where this concept is widely applied) and chemical industry, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), transport, and many others. It deals with slowdown of the progression of an “attack” against a “target” by using multiple and independent levels of protection (or lines of defense), designed to compensate for the failure of one or more defenses, ensuring that the risks are kept acceptable. Concerning the current practices for the DiD implementation and the rationale for its evolution, there is a shared recognition that the reinforcement of DiD is the key to improve the safety of future installations for all types of technologies and industries. Within this context, the results of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) play a key role in the demonstration of both the robustness of the design and safety, supporting the verification that the DiD principles are correctly implemented. A key issue, still open, is related to the link that must be put in place to provide the DiD probabilistic success criteria through PSA insights. After an analysis of DiD evolution in time and DiD application to different industrial fields, this paper deals with the key issue, still open, relevant to the link that must be put in place to provide the DiD probabilistic success criteria through PSA insights. Practical proposals outlined point out the open questions.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2016.62004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Defense in Depth (DiD) is a classical defensive concept currently applied to a variety of technical fields, including nuclear (where this concept is widely applied) and chemical industry, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), transport, and many others. It deals with slowdown of the progression of an “attack” against a “target” by using multiple and independent levels of protection (or lines of defense), designed to compensate for the failure of one or more defenses, ensuring that the risks are kept acceptable. Concerning the current practices for the DiD implementation and the rationale for its evolution, there is a shared recognition that the reinforcement of DiD is the key to improve the safety of future installations for all types of technologies and industries. Within this context, the results of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) play a key role in the demonstration of both the robustness of the design and safety, supporting the verification that the DiD principles are correctly implemented. A key issue, still open, is related to the link that must be put in place to provide the DiD probabilistic success criteria through PSA insights. After an analysis of DiD evolution in time and DiD application to different industrial fields, this paper deals with the key issue, still open, relevant to the link that must be put in place to provide the DiD probabilistic success criteria through PSA insights. Practical proposals outlined point out the open questions.
纵深防御方法的演变:跨部门分析
纵深防御(DiD)是一个经典的防御概念,目前应用于各种技术领域,包括核(这一概念被广泛应用)、化学工业、信息通信技术(ICT)、交通运输等。它通过使用多个和独立的保护级别(或防线)来处理针对“目标”的“攻击”进展的减缓,旨在补偿一个或多个防御的失败,确保风险保持在可接受的范围内。关于DiD实施的当前实践及其演变的基本原理,人们普遍认为,加强DiD是提高所有类型技术和行业未来设施安全性的关键。在这种情况下,概率安全评估(PSA)的结果在展示设计的稳健性和安全性方面发挥了关键作用,支持验证DiD原则的正确实施。一个仍未解决的关键问题是,必须通过PSA洞察提供DiD概率成功标准。在分析了DiD的时间演变和DiD在不同工业领域的应用之后,本文处理了关键问题,仍然是开放的,与必须通过PSA见解提供DiD概率成功标准的链接相关。提出的实际建议指出了有待解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信