REFORMULATION OF INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF A DIVERSITY-CONSCIOUS TEACHER EDUCATION AND PEDAGOGICAL SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT

Sylvia Esser
{"title":"REFORMULATION OF INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF A DIVERSITY-CONSCIOUS TEACHER EDUCATION AND PEDAGOGICAL SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT","authors":"Sylvia Esser","doi":"10.21608/ijcihe.2019.182878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of this area of research is based on the increasing importance of globalisation, mobility, migration and superdiversity (Vertovec 2002), as well as the associated responsibilities of the education system – and hence also on educational institutions. It is postulated in this context that intercultural skills are needed as core qualifications and professional competence within schools and universities (e.g. KRÜGER-POTRATZ 2010; AUERNHEIMER 2013). With reference to current scientific discourse and based on personal experience with regards to the operationalisation of education concepts for (further) development of intercultural competence, it is hypothesised that the concept is in part focused on lines of discourse based on a more traditional understanding of intercultural paedagogy. Many concepts are founded on the presentation of stereotypes and culturalisations and (artificial) homogenisations can be generated based on attributions.It is also highlighted that even in practical situations with a focus on intercultural competence, culturalisation is facilitated since determination through culture is suggested, hence there is orientation based on the model of national cultures and a unilateral and shortsighted focus on foreignness and (cultural) differences suppresses existing balances of power. MECHERIL clearly demonstrates that concepts must be fundamentally rethought and reformulated (MECHERIL 2013:16). This is precisely where my thesis work comes in Reformulation of Intercultural Competence.","PeriodicalId":382918,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Creativity and Innovation in Humanities and Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Creativity and Innovation in Humanities and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijcihe.2019.182878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The relevance of this area of research is based on the increasing importance of globalisation, mobility, migration and superdiversity (Vertovec 2002), as well as the associated responsibilities of the education system – and hence also on educational institutions. It is postulated in this context that intercultural skills are needed as core qualifications and professional competence within schools and universities (e.g. KRÜGER-POTRATZ 2010; AUERNHEIMER 2013). With reference to current scientific discourse and based on personal experience with regards to the operationalisation of education concepts for (further) development of intercultural competence, it is hypothesised that the concept is in part focused on lines of discourse based on a more traditional understanding of intercultural paedagogy. Many concepts are founded on the presentation of stereotypes and culturalisations and (artificial) homogenisations can be generated based on attributions.It is also highlighted that even in practical situations with a focus on intercultural competence, culturalisation is facilitated since determination through culture is suggested, hence there is orientation based on the model of national cultures and a unilateral and shortsighted focus on foreignness and (cultural) differences suppresses existing balances of power. MECHERIL clearly demonstrates that concepts must be fundamentally rethought and reformulated (MECHERIL 2013:16). This is precisely where my thesis work comes in Reformulation of Intercultural Competence.
在具有多样性意识的教师教育和教学学校发展的背景下,重新制定跨文化能力
这一研究领域的相关性是基于全球化、流动性、移民和超多样性日益增加的重要性(Vertovec 2002),以及教育系统的相关责任——因此也包括教育机构。在这种背景下,跨文化技能被认为是学校和大学需要的核心资格和专业能力(例如KRÜGER-POTRATZ 2010;AUERNHEIMER 2013)。参考当前的科学话语,并基于个人经验,关于跨文化能力(进一步)发展的教育概念的运作,假设该概念部分集中在基于对跨文化教育学的更传统理解的话语线上。许多概念都是建立在刻板印象和文化的呈现上,而(人为的)同质化可以基于归因产生。它还强调,即使在注重跨文化能力的实际情况下,文化化也会得到促进,因为建议通过文化来决定,因此存在基于民族文化模式的取向,片面和短视地关注外来性和(文化)差异会抑制现有的权力平衡。MECHERIL清楚地表明,概念必须从根本上重新思考和重新制定(MECHERIL 2013:16)。这正是我的论文《跨文化能力的重塑》的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信