Regulatory consolidation of coercion as a prerogative of the rule of law: A literary review

O. Tanase
{"title":"Regulatory consolidation of coercion as a prerogative of the rule of law: A literary review","authors":"O. Tanase","doi":"10.56215/04221204.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to coercion and the possibility of its application is an integral attribute of the state, its bodies, i.e., it is possible to discuss the state’s monopoly on coercion. Regardless of whether the requirements of legal norms are fulfilled voluntarily, coercion stays an integral part of their implementation. Legal coercion is inextricably linked to the rule of law and human rights. This connection is especially felt in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which have recently been freed from totalitarianism, the dictatorship of ideological norms, dominance, and the spread of coercion. The purpose of this study, the results of which are presented in this paper, is to reveal the essence of legal coercion at the theoretical level, analyse and generalize the scientific opinions of scientists who have already expressed themselves on this matter. The study uses a natural law approach and several methods aimed at a systematic and meaningful analysis of the problems of state coercion, the key of which are logical, dialectical, historical, and integrative methods. As a result of this study, it was established that the legal coercion applied by the state should make provision for proportional measures and sanctions in such a way as, on the one hand, to create the necessary inhibitory factors in the minds of those who try to break the law. On the other hand, it is coercion that should increase the sense of security in others, instilling in them the belief that the law, the state protects them and that there is no point in resorting to non-state, unofficial means to take the law into their own hands. The scientific significance of this study lies in the fact that it is one of the first studies covering the issue of legal coercion in the context of its use by the state to exercise its power in modern political and legal realities. In a practical sense, the results of this study may be important for improving legal regulation with an emphasis on coercion, specifically when adopting criminal law norms","PeriodicalId":334836,"journal":{"name":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/04221204.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right to coercion and the possibility of its application is an integral attribute of the state, its bodies, i.e., it is possible to discuss the state’s monopoly on coercion. Regardless of whether the requirements of legal norms are fulfilled voluntarily, coercion stays an integral part of their implementation. Legal coercion is inextricably linked to the rule of law and human rights. This connection is especially felt in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which have recently been freed from totalitarianism, the dictatorship of ideological norms, dominance, and the spread of coercion. The purpose of this study, the results of which are presented in this paper, is to reveal the essence of legal coercion at the theoretical level, analyse and generalize the scientific opinions of scientists who have already expressed themselves on this matter. The study uses a natural law approach and several methods aimed at a systematic and meaningful analysis of the problems of state coercion, the key of which are logical, dialectical, historical, and integrative methods. As a result of this study, it was established that the legal coercion applied by the state should make provision for proportional measures and sanctions in such a way as, on the one hand, to create the necessary inhibitory factors in the minds of those who try to break the law. On the other hand, it is coercion that should increase the sense of security in others, instilling in them the belief that the law, the state protects them and that there is no point in resorting to non-state, unofficial means to take the law into their own hands. The scientific significance of this study lies in the fact that it is one of the first studies covering the issue of legal coercion in the context of its use by the state to exercise its power in modern political and legal realities. In a practical sense, the results of this study may be important for improving legal regulation with an emphasis on coercion, specifically when adopting criminal law norms
作为法治特权的强制的监管巩固:一篇文学评论
强制权利及其适用的可能性是国家及其主体的固有属性,也就是说,可以讨论国家对强制的垄断。无论法律规范的要求是否自愿得到满足,强制都是其实施的一个组成部分。法律强制与法治和人权有着不可分割的联系。这种联系在中欧和东欧国家尤其明显,这些国家最近摆脱了极权主义、意识形态规范的独裁、统治和强制的蔓延。本研究的目的是在理论层面揭示法律强制的本质,分析和概括已经在这个问题上表达自己的科学家的科学观点。本研究采用自然法则的方法和几种方法,旨在对国家强制问题进行系统而有意义的分析,其中关键是逻辑方法、辩证方法、历史方法和综合方法。这项研究的结果是,国家所采用的法律强制应该规定相应的措施和制裁,一方面,在那些试图违法的人的头脑中创造必要的抑制因素。另一方面,强制应该增加他人的安全感,让他们相信法律和国家保护他们,没有必要诉诸非国家、非官方的手段将法律掌握在自己手中。本研究的科学意义在于,它是第一批在现代政治和法律现实中国家使用法律强制行使权力的背景下涵盖法律强制问题的研究之一。从实际意义上讲,本研究的结果可能对改善强调胁迫的法律法规,特别是在采用刑法规范时具有重要意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信