Tax Incentives and Household Investment in Complementary Pension Insurance: Some Recent Evidence from the Italian Experience

Immacolata Marino, F. Pericoli, L. Ventura
{"title":"Tax Incentives and Household Investment in Complementary Pension Insurance: Some Recent Evidence from the Italian Experience","authors":"Immacolata Marino, F. Pericoli, L. Ventura","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01198.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show, by a simple difference-in-difference methodology that, contrary to prior research, robustly raising the deductibility limit associated to pension fund holdings in Italy did not succeed in boosting households’ contributions to this form of savings. Some other empirical finding also suggest that this policy measure may have not even increased the average amount of first time contributors to such funds. In view of the specific features of the Italian market for complementary insurance (relatively young and less developed), these empirical results might be of interest to policymakers acting in countries with similar features (for instance, some of the more recent EU members).","PeriodicalId":192218,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Risk Management & Insurance Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Risk Management & Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01198.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We show, by a simple difference-in-difference methodology that, contrary to prior research, robustly raising the deductibility limit associated to pension fund holdings in Italy did not succeed in boosting households’ contributions to this form of savings. Some other empirical finding also suggest that this policy measure may have not even increased the average amount of first time contributors to such funds. In view of the specific features of the Italian market for complementary insurance (relatively young and less developed), these empirical results might be of interest to policymakers acting in countries with similar features (for instance, some of the more recent EU members).
税收优惠与补充养老保险的家庭投资:来自意大利经验的一些最新证据
我们通过一种简单的差中差方法表明,与之前的研究相反,在意大利,大力提高与养老基金持有相关的可抵扣限额并没有成功地提高家庭对这种储蓄形式的贡献。其他一些实证发现也表明,这一政策措施甚至可能没有增加此类基金首次缴款者的平均数额。鉴于意大利补充保险市场的具体特征(相对年轻和欠发达),这些实证结果可能会对具有类似特征的国家(例如,一些较新的欧盟成员国)的政策制定者感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信