Disparity Between Textbook Examples and What Young Students Find Interesting

Bowen Hui, Parsa Rajabi, Angie Pinchbeck
{"title":"Disparity Between Textbook Examples and What Young Students Find Interesting","authors":"Bowen Hui, Parsa Rajabi, Angie Pinchbeck","doi":"10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To keep young students engaged in computer science, it is crucial to develop teaching material that they find interesting and relevant. Unfortunately, standard CS1 textbooks typically use examples that are uninspiring or inaccessible to young people. To better understand the disparity between textbook examples and student interests, we analyzed a collection of CS1 textbooks and compared the resulting topics to those elicited from young students via focus groups. We found 47% of textbook topics (out of 53 topics from 910 code examples) did not overlap with any topic mentioned by our participants. Conversely, among the topics elicited from the participants, we found 29% of these topics (out of 24 topics from 1936 items) missing from textbooks. To measure the overlap between these two data samples, we computed the Bhattacharyya coefficient and obtained 0.4452 indicating a strong difference between the two sets. These results lead us to advocate for changes in the teaching materials in order to make them more engaging for young students.","PeriodicalId":408497,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To keep young students engaged in computer science, it is crucial to develop teaching material that they find interesting and relevant. Unfortunately, standard CS1 textbooks typically use examples that are uninspiring or inaccessible to young people. To better understand the disparity between textbook examples and student interests, we analyzed a collection of CS1 textbooks and compared the resulting topics to those elicited from young students via focus groups. We found 47% of textbook topics (out of 53 topics from 910 code examples) did not overlap with any topic mentioned by our participants. Conversely, among the topics elicited from the participants, we found 29% of these topics (out of 24 topics from 1936 items) missing from textbooks. To measure the overlap between these two data samples, we computed the Bhattacharyya coefficient and obtained 0.4452 indicating a strong difference between the two sets. These results lead us to advocate for changes in the teaching materials in order to make them more engaging for young students.
课本上的例子和年轻学生感兴趣的东西之间的差异
为了让年轻学生参与计算机科学,编写他们感兴趣和相关的教材是至关重要的。不幸的是,标准的CS1教科书通常使用的例子对年轻人来说缺乏启发性或难以理解。为了更好地理解教科书示例与学生兴趣之间的差异,我们分析了CS1教科书的集合,并将所得主题与通过焦点小组从年轻学生那里获得的主题进行了比较。我们发现47%的教科书主题(来自910个代码示例的53个主题)与我们的参与者提到的任何主题都不重叠。相反,在从参与者中引出的主题中,我们发现29%的这些主题(来自1936项的24个主题)在教科书中缺失。为了衡量这两个数据样本之间的重叠,我们计算了Bhattacharyya系数,得到0.4452,表明两组数据之间存在较大差异。这些结果促使我们提倡改变教材,使其更吸引年轻学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信