14 Digital health safety matters: early insights from a promising practice study in Australia

Melissa Andison
{"title":"14 Digital health safety matters: early insights from a promising practice study in Australia","authors":"Melissa Andison","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2022-fciasc.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveIt has been recognised that the Covid -19 pandemic positively accelerated digital adoption (Greenway et al., 2021;Issa, 2020). However, rapid deployments of technology do not often assess and understand patient safety risks;resulting in harm, which have ethical and legal considerations (HEE, 2019). The NHS has received caution of the potential risks of the use of new digital solutions during the pandemic (Hutchings, 2020). To nurture digital health safety, clinical safety risk management practice is worthy of study. Further, identifying factors that support the promising adoption and implementation of safety guidelines will develop maturity of the professional practice.MethodsConducted for a Master’s Dissertation in Digital Health Leadership with The Institute of Global Health Innovation Imperial College, this study uses a promising practice model to identify assets of the Australian healthcare system to achieve patient safety when deploying digital health technologies. The question guiding the study is: what are the factors that need to be evaluated to support the scaled adoption and implementation of digital health safety guidelines as a professional practice in Australia? Taking into consideration the socio-technological factors of digital health safety, the research strategy uses a mixed method to generate a creative and innovative study. Qualitative data has been collected from stakeholders including the Australasia Institute of Digital Health (AIDH) members and Certified Health Informatician Australasia (CHIA) Alumni via surveys, interviews and focus group. This will be analysed alongside data mined from existing documents and artifacts to understand trends, implications and what is grounded in national policy and strategy. It is expected data mining of resources will provide further insights into the maturity digital health safety practices.ResultsThe promising practice investigation is related to the larger problem of the adoption of safety standards to ensure innovative new ways of working do not compromise patient safety. The presentation will share results from the international literature review and early insights of the first phase of data analysis. Evidence from the literature has exposed the current healthcare information technology safety practice challenges. There were few studies that focused on the factors influencing the adoption of digital health safety standards. However, the review surfaced six key areas that need to be understood to improve safety practice and culture, which will be summarised in the presentation. A comparison of safety frameworks from England and Australia will be presented. In addition, a review of the unique assets of the Australian healthcare system will be provided. Finally, a maturity model to guide the professional practice to assist organisations determining their status in adopting digital health safety into governance, policy, process, culture, and other facets of operations will be shared (Rowlands, Zelcer & Williams, 2017).ConclusionAs a science, measuring the impact digital health and patient safety remains rudimentary (Singh & Sittig, 2016). The health science community recognises digital health safety is challenging and international efforts are being made to understand the socio-technical dynamics to ensure patient safety (Sittig et al., 2020). Given the national focus ‘to embed digital clinical safety across health and care’ (NHS X, 2021, p. 25), it is timely to look beyond to source exemplar organisations and best practice to participate in research (Gandhi et al., 2016). In contrast to the approach taken by the NHS Digital to mandate digital clinical safety standards, in Australia the Patient Safety Electronic Health (E-Health) Professional Practice Guidelines empowers organisations to establish ‘best fit’ with their strategic and operating context. This study is framed alongside the NHS Digital Clinical Safety Strategy and searches for evidence of a promising practice related to the Australian healthcare system and patient safety cult re. This presentation will be beneficial for Digital Clinical Safety Officers and Chief Clinical Information Officers developing a clinical safety risk management process, investing in team building, recourses, and capability.","PeriodicalId":290528,"journal":{"name":"Part II: ePosters","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Part II: ePosters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-fciasc.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveIt has been recognised that the Covid -19 pandemic positively accelerated digital adoption (Greenway et al., 2021;Issa, 2020). However, rapid deployments of technology do not often assess and understand patient safety risks;resulting in harm, which have ethical and legal considerations (HEE, 2019). The NHS has received caution of the potential risks of the use of new digital solutions during the pandemic (Hutchings, 2020). To nurture digital health safety, clinical safety risk management practice is worthy of study. Further, identifying factors that support the promising adoption and implementation of safety guidelines will develop maturity of the professional practice.MethodsConducted for a Master’s Dissertation in Digital Health Leadership with The Institute of Global Health Innovation Imperial College, this study uses a promising practice model to identify assets of the Australian healthcare system to achieve patient safety when deploying digital health technologies. The question guiding the study is: what are the factors that need to be evaluated to support the scaled adoption and implementation of digital health safety guidelines as a professional practice in Australia? Taking into consideration the socio-technological factors of digital health safety, the research strategy uses a mixed method to generate a creative and innovative study. Qualitative data has been collected from stakeholders including the Australasia Institute of Digital Health (AIDH) members and Certified Health Informatician Australasia (CHIA) Alumni via surveys, interviews and focus group. This will be analysed alongside data mined from existing documents and artifacts to understand trends, implications and what is grounded in national policy and strategy. It is expected data mining of resources will provide further insights into the maturity digital health safety practices.ResultsThe promising practice investigation is related to the larger problem of the adoption of safety standards to ensure innovative new ways of working do not compromise patient safety. The presentation will share results from the international literature review and early insights of the first phase of data analysis. Evidence from the literature has exposed the current healthcare information technology safety practice challenges. There were few studies that focused on the factors influencing the adoption of digital health safety standards. However, the review surfaced six key areas that need to be understood to improve safety practice and culture, which will be summarised in the presentation. A comparison of safety frameworks from England and Australia will be presented. In addition, a review of the unique assets of the Australian healthcare system will be provided. Finally, a maturity model to guide the professional practice to assist organisations determining their status in adopting digital health safety into governance, policy, process, culture, and other facets of operations will be shared (Rowlands, Zelcer & Williams, 2017).ConclusionAs a science, measuring the impact digital health and patient safety remains rudimentary (Singh & Sittig, 2016). The health science community recognises digital health safety is challenging and international efforts are being made to understand the socio-technical dynamics to ensure patient safety (Sittig et al., 2020). Given the national focus ‘to embed digital clinical safety across health and care’ (NHS X, 2021, p. 25), it is timely to look beyond to source exemplar organisations and best practice to participate in research (Gandhi et al., 2016). In contrast to the approach taken by the NHS Digital to mandate digital clinical safety standards, in Australia the Patient Safety Electronic Health (E-Health) Professional Practice Guidelines empowers organisations to establish ‘best fit’ with their strategic and operating context. This study is framed alongside the NHS Digital Clinical Safety Strategy and searches for evidence of a promising practice related to the Australian healthcare system and patient safety cult re. This presentation will be beneficial for Digital Clinical Safety Officers and Chief Clinical Information Officers developing a clinical safety risk management process, investing in team building, recourses, and capability.
14数字健康安全问题:来自澳大利亚一项有前景的实践研究的早期见解
人们已经认识到,2019冠状病毒病大流行积极加速了数字技术的采用(Greenway等人,2021年;Issa, 2020年)。然而,技术的快速部署往往无法评估和了解患者安全风险,从而导致伤害,这需要考虑伦理和法律因素(HEE, 2019)。NHS已经收到了在大流行期间使用新的数字解决方案的潜在风险的警告(Hutchings, 2020)。培育数字化健康安全,临床安全风险管理实践值得借鉴。此外,确定支持有希望采用和实施安全指南的因素将发展成熟的专业实践。方法本研究是为帝国理工学院全球健康创新研究所的数字健康领导力硕士论文而进行的,该研究使用了一个有前途的实践模型来识别澳大利亚医疗保健系统的资产,以在部署数字健康技术时实现患者安全。指导这项研究的问题是:为了支持在澳大利亚大规模采用和实施数字健康安全指南作为一种专业实践,需要评估哪些因素?考虑到数字健康安全的社会技术因素,研究策略使用混合方法来产生创造性和创新性的研究。通过调查、访谈和焦点小组,从包括澳大拉西亚数字健康研究所(AIDH)成员和澳大拉西亚注册健康信息学家(CHIA)校友在内的利益相关者那里收集了定性数据。这将与从现有文件和人工制品中挖掘的数据一起进行分析,以了解趋势、影响以及国家政策和战略的基础。预计资源的数据挖掘将进一步深入了解数字健康安全实践的成熟度。结果有希望的实践调查与采用安全标准以确保创新的新工作方式不损害患者安全的更大问题有关。报告将分享国际文献综述的结果和第一阶段数据分析的早期见解。来自文献的证据揭示了当前医疗信息技术安全实践的挑战。很少有研究关注影响采用数字健康安全标准的因素。然而,该审查提出了六个需要了解的关键领域,以改善安全实践和文化,这将在演讲中进行总结。将介绍英国和澳大利亚的安全框架的比较。此外,还将对澳大利亚医疗保健系统的独特资产进行审查。最后,将分享一个成熟度模型,以指导专业实践,帮助组织确定其在将数字健康安全纳入治理、政策、流程、文化和其他运营方面的地位(Rowlands, Zelcer & Williams, 2017)。作为一门科学,衡量数字健康和患者安全的影响仍然是初级的(Singh & Sittig, 2016)。健康科学界认识到,数字健康安全具有挑战性,国际上正在努力了解社会技术动态,以确保患者安全(Sittig等人,2020年)。鉴于国家的重点是“将数字临床安全嵌入到健康和护理中”(NHS X, 2021年,第25页),现在是时候寻找参与研究的范例组织和最佳实践了(Gandhi等人,2016年)。与NHS Digital所采取的强制执行数字化临床安全标准的方法相反,在澳大利亚,患者安全电子健康(E-Health)专业实践指南授权组织根据其战略和运营环境建立“最佳”。这项研究是与NHS数字临床安全战略一起制定的,并寻找与澳大利亚医疗保健系统和患者安全cult相关的有前途的实践的证据。该报告将有利于数字临床安全官和首席临床信息官制定临床安全风险管理流程,投资于团队建设,资源和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信