Dependencies in business process rule hierarchies

E. Pulvermüller, A. Speck, Sven Feja, Sören Witt
{"title":"Dependencies in business process rule hierarchies","authors":"E. Pulvermüller, A. Speck, Sven Feja, Sören Witt","doi":"10.1109/SoMeT.2013.6645663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated checking concepts for business process models support human testers considerably by saving time. However, this new checking ability results in a comparatively large number of rules representing requirements. But without a comprehensible representation of the relations between the rules on the one hand its hard to keep track on the validated rules and on the other hand to correctly interpret the validation results. In this paper we propose an improvement for the automated validation of business process models by offering elements to create abstract rules and arranging these rules in hierarchies. Top-down and bottom-up testing are supported by stepwise activating (and validating) the rules starting from the top of the hierarchy (or bottom respectively). Moreover, the rule hierarchies may be reused when similar systems are to be validated by configuring a valid rule sub-set for the specific business process system.","PeriodicalId":447065,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 12th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SoMeT)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 12th International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques (SoMeT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SoMeT.2013.6645663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated checking concepts for business process models support human testers considerably by saving time. However, this new checking ability results in a comparatively large number of rules representing requirements. But without a comprehensible representation of the relations between the rules on the one hand its hard to keep track on the validated rules and on the other hand to correctly interpret the validation results. In this paper we propose an improvement for the automated validation of business process models by offering elements to create abstract rules and arranging these rules in hierarchies. Top-down and bottom-up testing are supported by stepwise activating (and validating) the rules starting from the top of the hierarchy (or bottom respectively). Moreover, the rule hierarchies may be reused when similar systems are to be validated by configuring a valid rule sub-set for the specific business process system.
业务流程规则层次结构中的依赖关系
业务流程模型的自动检查概念通过节省时间来极大地支持人工测试人员。然而,这种新的检查功能导致了相对大量的表示需求的规则。但是,如果没有规则之间关系的可理解表示,则一方面很难跟踪已验证的规则,另一方面也很难正确解释验证结果。本文通过提供元素来创建抽象规则并将这些规则安排在层次结构中,提出了对业务流程模型自动验证的改进。通过从层次结构的顶部(或分别从底部)开始逐步激活(和验证)规则,支持自顶向下和自底向上的测试。此外,当要通过为特定业务流程系统配置有效的规则子集来验证类似的系统时,可以重用规则层次结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信