145 A novel convenient way of performing medial approach to sciatic nerve block in supine position

Jw Lim, Y. Cheng
{"title":"145 A novel convenient way of performing medial approach to sciatic nerve block in supine position","authors":"Jw Lim, Y. Cheng","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"145 Figure 1 Abstract 144 Figure 1 Abstracts A76 Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021;70(Suppl 1):A1–A127 coright. on S etem er 6, 2021 by gest. P rocted by htt//rapm bm jcom / R eg A nsth P in M d: frst pulished as 10.136/rapm -221-E S R A .45 on 9 S etem er 221. D ow nladed fom medially, allowing greater surface area for spread of local anesthesia. Vascular structures were further from sciatic nerve, reducing the risk of intravascular injection of local anaesthesia. With tibial nerve approached first medially, risk of common peroneal nerve injury could be reduced compared to lateral approach. Conclusions Our proposed position for medial approach of sciatic nerve block saves positioning time, with greater surface area for spread of local anesthesia, likely reducing the risk of intravascular injection of local anaesthesia and common peroneal nerve injury. 146 ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK AND FEMORAL TRIANGLE BLOCK: COMPARISON OF TIME TO ACHIEVE DISCHARGE CRITERIA AND EVALUATION OF LOCAL ANESTHETIC SPREAD N Sakai*, C Taruishi, T Sudani. Daiyukai General Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan 10.1136/rapm-2021-ESRA.146 Background and Aims The femoral triangle block (FTB) and adductor canal block (ACB) have become standard analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the anatomical difference and postoperative recovery between two blocks. Methods We randomly assigned 118 patients to the FTB or ACB group. Patients were given 10 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine as FTB or ACB. FTB was defined as at the mid-thigh, and ACB at the apex of the femoral triangle. The primary outcome was to achieve the discharge criteria (pain control with oral analgesics, knee flexion >90°, and ambulatory rehabilitation). ACB would be noninferior to FTB if the 95% confidence interval of the two groups’ differences were closer to zero than -9 hours (margin). We compared the local anesthetic spread, straight leg raise (SLR), and other outcomes. Results The time to achieve discharge criteria was 56.3±17.3 hours in the ACB group and 56.2±18.4 hours in the FTB group, a difference of 0.1 hours (95% CI: -6.4–6.6 hours, p=0.97), establishing noninferiority. At one hour postoperatively, 48 of 60 patients in ACB and 40 of 58 patients in FTB were capable of SLR (Odds ratio:0.59, p=0.29), a nonsignificant difference. The distance between the two points was 5.1 (4.9–5.4) cm, and the spread of local anesthetics was 6.9 cm cephalad, 5.1 cm caudad. There were no differences in pain scores or other outcomes. Conclusions ACB was non-inferior to FTB in time to achieve discharge criteria. We must warn of the potential quadriceps weakness after local anesthetic injection because of the high cephalad spread. 147 ERECTOR ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK FOR ANALGESIA IN A PATIENT HAVING UNDERGONE CLAM SHELL THORACOTOMYSPINAE BLOCK FOR ANALGESIA IN A PATIENT HAVING UNDERGONE CLAM SHELL","PeriodicalId":156213,"journal":{"name":"Peripheral nerve blocks","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peripheral nerve blocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

145 Figure 1 Abstract 144 Figure 1 Abstracts A76 Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021;70(Suppl 1):A1–A127 coright. on S etem er 6, 2021 by gest. P rocted by htt//rapm bm jcom / R eg A nsth P in M d: frst pulished as 10.136/rapm -221-E S R A .45 on 9 S etem er 221. D ow nladed fom medially, allowing greater surface area for spread of local anesthesia. Vascular structures were further from sciatic nerve, reducing the risk of intravascular injection of local anaesthesia. With tibial nerve approached first medially, risk of common peroneal nerve injury could be reduced compared to lateral approach. Conclusions Our proposed position for medial approach of sciatic nerve block saves positioning time, with greater surface area for spread of local anesthesia, likely reducing the risk of intravascular injection of local anaesthesia and common peroneal nerve injury. 146 ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK AND FEMORAL TRIANGLE BLOCK: COMPARISON OF TIME TO ACHIEVE DISCHARGE CRITERIA AND EVALUATION OF LOCAL ANESTHETIC SPREAD N Sakai*, C Taruishi, T Sudani. Daiyukai General Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan 10.1136/rapm-2021-ESRA.146 Background and Aims The femoral triangle block (FTB) and adductor canal block (ACB) have become standard analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared the anatomical difference and postoperative recovery between two blocks. Methods We randomly assigned 118 patients to the FTB or ACB group. Patients were given 10 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine as FTB or ACB. FTB was defined as at the mid-thigh, and ACB at the apex of the femoral triangle. The primary outcome was to achieve the discharge criteria (pain control with oral analgesics, knee flexion >90°, and ambulatory rehabilitation). ACB would be noninferior to FTB if the 95% confidence interval of the two groups’ differences were closer to zero than -9 hours (margin). We compared the local anesthetic spread, straight leg raise (SLR), and other outcomes. Results The time to achieve discharge criteria was 56.3±17.3 hours in the ACB group and 56.2±18.4 hours in the FTB group, a difference of 0.1 hours (95% CI: -6.4–6.6 hours, p=0.97), establishing noninferiority. At one hour postoperatively, 48 of 60 patients in ACB and 40 of 58 patients in FTB were capable of SLR (Odds ratio:0.59, p=0.29), a nonsignificant difference. The distance between the two points was 5.1 (4.9–5.4) cm, and the spread of local anesthetics was 6.9 cm cephalad, 5.1 cm caudad. There were no differences in pain scores or other outcomes. Conclusions ACB was non-inferior to FTB in time to achieve discharge criteria. We must warn of the potential quadriceps weakness after local anesthetic injection because of the high cephalad spread. 147 ERECTOR ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK FOR ANALGESIA IN A PATIENT HAVING UNDERGONE CLAM SHELL THORACOTOMYSPINAE BLOCK FOR ANALGESIA IN A PATIENT HAVING UNDERGONE CLAM SHELL
145一种新的方便的坐骨神经阻滞内侧入路方法
145图1摘要144图1摘要A76 Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021;70(增刊1):A1-A127 right。到2021年5月6日为止。[footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1] [footnoteref: 1]。]从内侧植入,为局部麻醉的扩散提供了更大的表面积。血管结构远离坐骨神经,减少了血管内注射局部麻醉的风险。与外侧入路相比,胫骨神经首先内侧入路可降低腓总神经损伤的风险。结论我们提出的坐骨神经阻滞内侧入路体位节省了体位时间,有更大的局部麻醉扩散表面积,有可能降低血管内注射局麻和腓总神经损伤的风险。[46]内收管阻滞与股三角阻滞:达到出院标准时间的比较及局麻扩散的评价[j]。日本一宫大禹会总医院,10.1136/rapm-2021-ESRA.146背景与目的股三角阻滞(FTB)和内收管阻滞(ACB)已成为全膝关节置换术(TKA)的标准镇痛方法。我们比较了两组间的解剖差异和术后恢复情况。方法将118例患者随机分为FTB组和ACB组。患者给予0.25%左布比卡因10 mL作为FTB或ACB。FTB定义在大腿中部,ACB定义在股三角顶端。主要结局是达到出院标准(口服镇痛药控制疼痛,膝关节屈曲bbb90°,门诊康复)。如果两组差异的95%置信区间接近于零,且小于-9小时(边际),则ACB不低于FTB。我们比较了局麻扩散、直腿抬高(SLR)和其他结果。结果ACB组达到出院标准时间为56.3±17.3 h, FTB组为56.2±18.4 h,差异为0.1 h (95% CI: -6.4 ~ 6.6 h, p=0.97),无劣效性。术后1小时,60例ACB患者中有48例发生SLR, 58例FTB患者中有40例发生SLR(优势比:0.59,p=0.29),差异无统计学意义。两点间距5.1 (4.9 ~ 5.4)cm,局麻药的扩散为头侧6.9 cm,尾侧5.1 cm。疼痛评分和其他结果没有差异。结论ACB及时达到出院标准不低于FTB。由于头侧高度扩散,我们必须警惕局部麻醉注射后潜在的股四头肌无力。147在接受过蛤壳手术的病人中用于镇痛的竖脊肌阻滞用于接受蛤壳手术的病人的镇痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信