Understanding National Level Logistics Costs: Methodological Approach

S. Chakrabartty
{"title":"Understanding National Level Logistics Costs: Methodological Approach","authors":"S. Chakrabartty","doi":"10.1177/26316846221107419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logistics cost (LC) estimated by different methods are not comparable since cost components differ across countries and are not properly standardised, non-availability of comprehensive reliable data on LC and presence of number of qualitative components. No method of measuring LC has considered probability distributions of the components/dimensions. After review of methods to estimate LC, the article proposes to transfer the j-th component score emerging from questionnaire-based approach to a proposed score ( P j ) so that 0 ≤ P j ≤ 100 and follows normal distribution. Logistics cost index (LCI) of i-th country is taken as multiplicative aggregation of ratios of P j at the current period and base period of all components. The index avoids perfect substitutability of arithmetic aggregation, and it satisfies the desired properties of an index including time-reversal test and formation of chain-indices, and enables meaningful comparisons across time and space, better ranking and classifying the countries, identification of critical dimensions/components requiring policy changes, drawing path of decline or increase of LCI over time for a country, computing mean LCI for a group of countries and LCI at Global level, and undertaking statistical analysis under parametric set up. Future investigations suggested reflecting properties of the proposed LCI along with empirical relationships of sector-wise LCI and economic development. JEL Codes: D57, E23, P44","PeriodicalId":188097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economic Integration","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26316846221107419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Logistics cost (LC) estimated by different methods are not comparable since cost components differ across countries and are not properly standardised, non-availability of comprehensive reliable data on LC and presence of number of qualitative components. No method of measuring LC has considered probability distributions of the components/dimensions. After review of methods to estimate LC, the article proposes to transfer the j-th component score emerging from questionnaire-based approach to a proposed score ( P j ) so that 0 ≤ P j ≤ 100 and follows normal distribution. Logistics cost index (LCI) of i-th country is taken as multiplicative aggregation of ratios of P j at the current period and base period of all components. The index avoids perfect substitutability of arithmetic aggregation, and it satisfies the desired properties of an index including time-reversal test and formation of chain-indices, and enables meaningful comparisons across time and space, better ranking and classifying the countries, identification of critical dimensions/components requiring policy changes, drawing path of decline or increase of LCI over time for a country, computing mean LCI for a group of countries and LCI at Global level, and undertaking statistical analysis under parametric set up. Future investigations suggested reflecting properties of the proposed LCI along with empirical relationships of sector-wise LCI and economic development. JEL Codes: D57, E23, P44
理解国家级物流成本:方法论方法
通过不同方法估计的物流成本(LC)不具有可比性,因为成本组成部分在各国之间存在差异,并且没有适当的标准化,无法获得关于LC的全面可靠数据以及存在许多定性组成部分。没有一种测量LC的方法考虑了组件/维度的概率分布。在回顾了估计LC的方法后,本文提出将基于问卷的方法得出的第j个成分得分转化为建议得分(P j),使0≤P j≤100,并遵循正态分布。将第1个国家的物流成本指数(LCI)取为各组成部分当期与基期比率的乘积总和。该指数避免了算术聚合的完全可替代性,满足了指数的期望属性,包括时间反转检验和链式指数的形成,并能够跨时间和空间进行有意义的比较,更好地对国家进行排名和分类,识别需要政策变化的关键维度/组成部分,绘制一个国家LCI随时间的下降或增加路径,计算一组国家的平均LCI和全球水平的LCI。并在参数设置下进行统计分析。未来的研究建议反映所提出的LCI的性质以及部门LCI与经济发展的经验关系。JEL代码:D57, E23, P44
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信