A Simulation Software for the Evaluation of Vulnerabilities in Reputation Management Systems

V. Agate, A. D. Paola, G. Re, M. Morana
{"title":"A Simulation Software for the Evaluation of Vulnerabilities in Reputation Management Systems","authors":"V. Agate, A. D. Paola, G. Re, M. Morana","doi":"10.1145/3458510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-agent distributed systems are characterized by autonomous entities that interact with each other to provide, and/or request, different kinds of services. In several contexts, especially when a reward is offered according to the quality of service, individual agents (or coordinated groups) may act in a selfish way. To prevent such behaviours, distributed Reputation Management Systems (RMSs) provide every agent with the capability of computing the reputation of the others according to direct past interactions, as well as indirect opinions reported by their neighbourhood. This last point introduces a weakness on gossiped information that makes RMSs vulnerable to malicious agents’ intent on disseminating false reputation values. Given the variety of application scenarios in which RMSs can be adopted, as well as the multitude of behaviours that agents can implement, designers need RMS evaluation tools that allow them to predict the robustness of the system to security attacks, before its actual deployment. To this aim, we present a simulation software for the vulnerability evaluation of RMSs and illustrate three case studies in which this tool was effectively used to model and assess state-of-the-art RMSs.","PeriodicalId":318554,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3458510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Multi-agent distributed systems are characterized by autonomous entities that interact with each other to provide, and/or request, different kinds of services. In several contexts, especially when a reward is offered according to the quality of service, individual agents (or coordinated groups) may act in a selfish way. To prevent such behaviours, distributed Reputation Management Systems (RMSs) provide every agent with the capability of computing the reputation of the others according to direct past interactions, as well as indirect opinions reported by their neighbourhood. This last point introduces a weakness on gossiped information that makes RMSs vulnerable to malicious agents’ intent on disseminating false reputation values. Given the variety of application scenarios in which RMSs can be adopted, as well as the multitude of behaviours that agents can implement, designers need RMS evaluation tools that allow them to predict the robustness of the system to security attacks, before its actual deployment. To this aim, we present a simulation software for the vulnerability evaluation of RMSs and illustrate three case studies in which this tool was effectively used to model and assess state-of-the-art RMSs.
信誉管理系统漏洞评估仿真软件
多代理分布式系统的特点是自治实体相互交互,以提供和/或请求不同类型的服务。在某些情况下,特别是当根据服务质量提供奖励时,个体代理(或协调的群体)可能会以自私的方式行事。为了防止这种行为,分布式声誉管理系统(RMSs)为每个代理提供了根据过去的直接互动以及邻居报告的间接意见计算其他代理的声誉的能力。最后一点引入了流言信息的弱点,这使得RMSs容易受到恶意代理意图传播虚假声誉值的攻击。考虑到可以采用RMS的各种应用程序场景,以及代理可以实现的大量行为,设计人员需要RMS评估工具,使他们能够在实际部署之前预测系统对安全攻击的健壮性。为此,我们提出了一个用于RMSs脆弱性评估的模拟软件,并举例说明了三个案例研究,其中该工具被有效地用于建模和评估最先进的RMSs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信