Assessing Internal Pitting Corrosion With Encoded Ultrasonic Scanning

Joe Chen, Yanping Li, T. Place, Axel Aulin, Logan Galbraith
{"title":"Assessing Internal Pitting Corrosion With Encoded Ultrasonic Scanning","authors":"Joe Chen, Yanping Li, T. Place, Axel Aulin, Logan Galbraith","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-86884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Internal corrosion is one of the main threats to pipeline integrity. For in-line inspection (ILI) based integrity programs, in-the-ditch non-destructive examination (NDE) data quality is imperative for ILI validation. NDE feature misclassification and/or depth inaccuracy can lead to unnecessary integrity actions such as unnecessary excavations, more frequent ILI, or increased risk to system integrity. Therefore, it is critical to ensure the accuracy of NDE data.\n Ultrasonic Testing (UT) technology is the primary method to detect, characterize, and measure internal corrosion during in-ditch NDE. While studies have been conducted to understand various NDE technologies and capabilities associated with detecting, sizing, and classifying crack and external corrosion indications, less work has been published regarding field evaluation of internal corrosion indications.\n In this study, real cases of liquid pipelines will be used to demonstrate the challenges in detecting, characterizing and sizing internal corrosion using current UT technologies. The cases show that improper NDE technique selection triggered additional excavations or caused internal corrosion to be non-conservatively under-reported. This work also includes various UT technologies, such as encoded zero-degree UT scanning, manual zero-degree UT testing, encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT), and Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) for characterizing and sizing both natural and machined defects in pipe and plate samples. High-resolution laser scans using Creaform HandyScan technology are used to verify actual feature depth. Depth sizing accuracy of each technology is established using statistical analysis. In order to determine detection limits of the above technologies, tests are performed on pitting and inclusion of various sizes, ranging from 8 mm to 0.5 mm in diameter.\n This study will assist in establishing the limitations of current UT NDE technologies and recommendations to develop best practices for obtaining quality field NDE data from pipeline excavations for internal corrosion.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-86884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal corrosion is one of the main threats to pipeline integrity. For in-line inspection (ILI) based integrity programs, in-the-ditch non-destructive examination (NDE) data quality is imperative for ILI validation. NDE feature misclassification and/or depth inaccuracy can lead to unnecessary integrity actions such as unnecessary excavations, more frequent ILI, or increased risk to system integrity. Therefore, it is critical to ensure the accuracy of NDE data. Ultrasonic Testing (UT) technology is the primary method to detect, characterize, and measure internal corrosion during in-ditch NDE. While studies have been conducted to understand various NDE technologies and capabilities associated with detecting, sizing, and classifying crack and external corrosion indications, less work has been published regarding field evaluation of internal corrosion indications. In this study, real cases of liquid pipelines will be used to demonstrate the challenges in detecting, characterizing and sizing internal corrosion using current UT technologies. The cases show that improper NDE technique selection triggered additional excavations or caused internal corrosion to be non-conservatively under-reported. This work also includes various UT technologies, such as encoded zero-degree UT scanning, manual zero-degree UT testing, encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT), and Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) for characterizing and sizing both natural and machined defects in pipe and plate samples. High-resolution laser scans using Creaform HandyScan technology are used to verify actual feature depth. Depth sizing accuracy of each technology is established using statistical analysis. In order to determine detection limits of the above technologies, tests are performed on pitting and inclusion of various sizes, ranging from 8 mm to 0.5 mm in diameter. This study will assist in establishing the limitations of current UT NDE technologies and recommendations to develop best practices for obtaining quality field NDE data from pipeline excavations for internal corrosion.
用编码超声扫描评估内部点蚀
管道内部腐蚀是管道完整性的主要威胁之一。对于基于在线检测(ILI)的完整性程序,沟内无损检测(NDE)数据质量对于ILI验证至关重要。NDE特征的错误分类和/或深度不准确可能导致不必要的完整性操作,如不必要的挖掘,更频繁的ILI,或增加系统完整性的风险。因此,确保无损检测数据的准确性至关重要。超声检测(UT)技术是沟内无损检测(NDE)过程中检测、表征和测量内部腐蚀的主要方法。虽然已经进行了研究,以了解各种无损检测技术和与检测、大小和分类裂缝和外部腐蚀迹象相关的能力,但关于内部腐蚀迹象的现场评估的工作却很少。在本研究中,将使用液体管道的真实案例来展示使用当前UT技术检测、表征和确定内部腐蚀的挑战。案例表明,不当的NDE技术选择引发了额外的挖掘或导致内部腐蚀的非保守性低估。这项工作还包括各种UT技术,例如编码零度UT扫描,手动零度UT测试,编码相控阵超声波测试(PAUT)和飞行时间衍射(TOFD),用于表征和确定管道和板样品中自然和加工缺陷的尺寸。使用Creaform HandyScan技术的高分辨率激光扫描用于验证实际特征深度。通过统计分析,确定了每种工艺的深度尺寸精度。为了确定上述技术的检测限,对直径为8毫米至0.5毫米的各种尺寸的点蚀和夹杂物进行了测试。这项研究将有助于确定当前UT无损检测技术的局限性,并建议制定最佳实践,从管道挖掘中获得高质量的现场无损检测数据,以进行内部腐蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信