Team oriented capstone design course management: a new approach to team formulation and evaluation

J. Emanuel, K. Worthington
{"title":"Team oriented capstone design course management: a new approach to team formulation and evaluation","authors":"J. Emanuel, K. Worthington","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1989.69408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors report on a scheme for evaluating students involved in team-oriented capstone engineering design projects. This scheme, implemented in Bradley's Industrial Engineering Department, addresses the problems associated with forming teams, potential interpersonal conflicts within the team, and the difficulty in assigning grades to individuals when the project is a team project. Under the scheme the categories, point values, and weights will vary for different programs. This method of evaluation give the faculty a more objective (and more defensible) approach to team project grading. The faculty involved in each program will have to decide on modifications to this scheme depending on their own requirements.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":319513,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1989.69408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The authors report on a scheme for evaluating students involved in team-oriented capstone engineering design projects. This scheme, implemented in Bradley's Industrial Engineering Department, addresses the problems associated with forming teams, potential interpersonal conflicts within the team, and the difficulty in assigning grades to individuals when the project is a team project. Under the scheme the categories, point values, and weights will vary for different programs. This method of evaluation give the faculty a more objective (and more defensible) approach to team project grading. The faculty involved in each program will have to decide on modifications to this scheme depending on their own requirements.<>
面向团队的顶点设计课程管理:团队形成与评估的新途径
作者报告了一种评估学生参与团队导向的顶点工程设计项目的方案。这个方案在布拉德利的工业工程部门实施,解决了与组建团队有关的问题,团队内部潜在的人际冲突,以及当项目是一个团队项目时给个人打分的困难。在该方案下,不同项目的分类、积分值和权重会有所不同。这种评估方法为教师提供了一个更客观(也更站得住脚)的方法来给团队项目评分。参与每个项目的教师将不得不根据自己的需求决定对该方案的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信