Demographic Uncertainty and Welfare in a Life-Cycle Model Under Alternative Public Pension Systems

M. Rahman
{"title":"Demographic Uncertainty and Welfare in a Life-Cycle Model Under Alternative Public Pension Systems","authors":"M. Rahman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1270643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I analyze consumption, aggregate savings,output and welfare implications of …ve dierent social security arragements whenever there is demographic uncertanity. Following Bohn(2002), I analyze the eect of an uncetain population growth in an extended version of a modi…ed Life-cycle model developed by Gertler(1999). Population growth dampens savings and output under all arrangements. Pay-as-you-go-De…ned Bene…t system appears to fare better than all other alternatives, falling short of the private annuity market with no pension system. But social security in general increases social welfare, with Fully Funded systems faring the best. Thus there appears to be a clear tradeobewteen growth and social welfare. The social security system also reduces the volatility of the economy.","PeriodicalId":316250,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1270643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze consumption, aggregate savings,output and welfare implications of …ve dierent social security arragements whenever there is demographic uncertanity. Following Bohn(2002), I analyze the eect of an uncetain population growth in an extended version of a modi…ed Life-cycle model developed by Gertler(1999). Population growth dampens savings and output under all arrangements. Pay-as-you-go-De…ned Bene…t system appears to fare better than all other alternatives, falling short of the private annuity market with no pension system. But social security in general increases social welfare, with Fully Funded systems faring the best. Thus there appears to be a clear tradeobewteen growth and social welfare. The social security system also reduces the volatility of the economy.
另类公共养老金制度下生命周期模型中的人口不确定性与福利
在本文中,我分析了在存在人口不确定性时,五种不同的社会保障安排对消费、总储蓄、产出和福利的影响。继Bohn(2002)之后,我在Gertler(1999)开发的修正生命周期模型的扩展版本中分析了不确定人口增长的影响。在所有安排下,人口增长都会抑制储蓄和产出。“现收现付”(pay -as-you- de - ned - Bene)体系的表现似乎比其他所有选择都要好,不及没有养老金体系的私人年金市场。但总的来说,社会保障增加了社会福利,其中全基金制度表现最好。因此,在青少年成长和社会福利之间似乎存在着一种明显的交易。社会保障制度也降低了经济的波动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信