The Impact of Online Peer Feedback on Railway Engineering Students' Academic Writing: The Case of Google Docs

Mahboubeh Taghizadeh, Kafiyeh Assadollahi
{"title":"The Impact of Online Peer Feedback on Railway Engineering Students' Academic Writing: The Case of Google Docs","authors":"Mahboubeh Taghizadeh, Kafiyeh Assadollahi","doi":"10.1109/ICeLeT55619.2022.9765437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the difference in academic writing performance of railway engineering students after giving feedback to their peers, to determine their views of the benefits of assessing writing tasks on Google Docs, and to explore their perceptions of the roles of giving feedback and correcting peers' paragraphs in improving academic writing performance. The participants were 40 railway engineering students at Iran University of Science and Technology. The instruments were pre and post-tests of writing along with two open-ended questions. The results revealed that the experimental group performed better on the posttest after giving feedback to their peers. Assessing without time limitation and disruption, correcting writing tasks more precisely, and enhancing lexical and grammatical knowledge were the benefits of assessing peers' writing tasks in Google Docs. Students also held the view that it could help them get familiar with the academic writing principles and how to correct writing tasks.","PeriodicalId":138384,"journal":{"name":"2022 9th International and the 15th National Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICeLeT)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 9th International and the 15th National Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICeLeT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeT55619.2022.9765437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the difference in academic writing performance of railway engineering students after giving feedback to their peers, to determine their views of the benefits of assessing writing tasks on Google Docs, and to explore their perceptions of the roles of giving feedback and correcting peers' paragraphs in improving academic writing performance. The participants were 40 railway engineering students at Iran University of Science and Technology. The instruments were pre and post-tests of writing along with two open-ended questions. The results revealed that the experimental group performed better on the posttest after giving feedback to their peers. Assessing without time limitation and disruption, correcting writing tasks more precisely, and enhancing lexical and grammatical knowledge were the benefits of assessing peers' writing tasks in Google Docs. Students also held the view that it could help them get familiar with the academic writing principles and how to correct writing tasks.
网络同伴反馈对铁路工程专业学生学术写作的影响:以Google Docs为例
本研究旨在探讨铁路工程专业学生在向同伴提供反馈后学术写作表现的差异,确定他们对谷歌Docs上评估写作任务的好处的看法,并探讨他们对反馈和纠正同伴段落在提高学术写作表现中的作用的看法。参与者是伊朗科技大学铁路工程专业的40名学生。这些工具包括写作前和写作后的测试,以及两个开放式问题。结果显示,实验组在给同伴反馈后的后测中表现更好。在谷歌文档中评估同伴的写作任务的好处是没有时间限制和中断,更准确地纠正写作任务,提高词汇和语法知识。学生们还认为,这可以帮助他们熟悉学术写作原则和如何纠正写作任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信