Strategic bidding of Gencos under two pricing mechanisms: Pay-as-bid and uniform pricing

S. Soleymani
{"title":"Strategic bidding of Gencos under two pricing mechanisms: Pay-as-bid and uniform pricing","authors":"S. Soleymani","doi":"10.1109/IEEEGCC.2011.5752638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the behavior of Generating Companies (Gencos) in the two competing pricing mechanisms of uniform and pay-as-bid pricing in an electricity market. Game Theory is used to simulate bidding behavior of Gencos and develop Nash equilibrium bidding strategies for Gencos in electricity markets. In the proposed methodology, competition is modeled as a bi-level problem with the upper level subproblem representing individual Gencos for maximizing their profits, and the lower level sub-problem representing the Independent System Operator (ISO), which minimizes consumer's payments. The simulation results show that Gencos yield less total revenue in expectation under pay-as-bid pricing than under uniform pricing.","PeriodicalId":119104,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEEGCC.2011.5752638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper compares the behavior of Generating Companies (Gencos) in the two competing pricing mechanisms of uniform and pay-as-bid pricing in an electricity market. Game Theory is used to simulate bidding behavior of Gencos and develop Nash equilibrium bidding strategies for Gencos in electricity markets. In the proposed methodology, competition is modeled as a bi-level problem with the upper level subproblem representing individual Gencos for maximizing their profits, and the lower level sub-problem representing the Independent System Operator (ISO), which minimizes consumer's payments. The simulation results show that Gencos yield less total revenue in expectation under pay-as-bid pricing than under uniform pricing.
两种定价机制下的发电公司战略竞价:按出价付费和统一定价
本文比较了电力市场上发电企业在统一定价和按出价付费两种竞争定价机制下的行为。运用博弈论的方法对发电企业的竞价行为进行模拟,建立发电企业在电力市场上的纳什均衡竞价策略。在提出的方法中,竞争被建模为一个双层问题,上层子问题代表单个发电公司最大化其利润,下层子问题代表独立系统运营商(ISO),使消费者支付最小化。仿真结果表明,在按出价付费定价下,发电公司的预期总收益低于统一定价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信