Field failure rate may not be what you think

J. McLinn, D. Rand
{"title":"Field failure rate may not be what you think","authors":"J. McLinn, D. Rand","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ramp up, commercialization or roll-out are all common terms for one stage of a project when it goes from a low level production rate to a high rate. During this time, it is common for new problems to arise and the time to failure remain unknown. When shipping systems without operating time clocks or serialization, only the quantities shipped and quantities replaced are known. Weibull modeling generated from such roll-out data can easily be misleading. This paper will show some common errors with these model attempts that can be avoided. The roll-out process itself is part of the problem. Often, this is a hurried phase of limited time that is followed by a longer and fairly steady production rate. Even when ramping with a constant failure rate situation, it takes more than six months for the Weibull model data to settle down and look constant. Add a second failure mode, one that occurs in addition to the constant failure rate and the result is a complex Weibull curve that doesn't reflect either mode well. This easily happens when the operating environment varies from customer to customer. Several examples will make this graphically clear. Lastly, some conclusions are presented and some suggestions that will help separate failure modes during the ramp up. These suggestions will help obtain better estimates for planning warranty costs and determining repair support necessary. The problem described is real; examples from the disk drive industry are cited where ramp up and multiple failure modes are intertwined [1, 2, 3].","PeriodicalId":299782,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ramp up, commercialization or roll-out are all common terms for one stage of a project when it goes from a low level production rate to a high rate. During this time, it is common for new problems to arise and the time to failure remain unknown. When shipping systems without operating time clocks or serialization, only the quantities shipped and quantities replaced are known. Weibull modeling generated from such roll-out data can easily be misleading. This paper will show some common errors with these model attempts that can be avoided. The roll-out process itself is part of the problem. Often, this is a hurried phase of limited time that is followed by a longer and fairly steady production rate. Even when ramping with a constant failure rate situation, it takes more than six months for the Weibull model data to settle down and look constant. Add a second failure mode, one that occurs in addition to the constant failure rate and the result is a complex Weibull curve that doesn't reflect either mode well. This easily happens when the operating environment varies from customer to customer. Several examples will make this graphically clear. Lastly, some conclusions are presented and some suggestions that will help separate failure modes during the ramp up. These suggestions will help obtain better estimates for planning warranty costs and determining repair support necessary. The problem described is real; examples from the disk drive industry are cited where ramp up and multiple failure modes are intertwined [1, 2, 3].
现场失败率可能不是你想的那样
斜坡、商业化或铺开都是项目从低水平生产率到高水平生产率的一个阶段的常见术语。在此期间,通常会出现新的问题,而失败的时间仍然未知。当运输系统没有操作时间时钟或序列化时,只知道运输的数量和替换的数量。由此类推出数据生成的威布尔建模很容易产生误导。本文将展示这些模型尝试中可以避免的一些常见错误。推出过程本身就是问题的一部分。通常,这是一个有限时间内的匆忙阶段,随后是一个较长且相当稳定的生产率。即使在故障率恒定的情况下,威布尔模型数据也需要6个多月的时间才能稳定下来并保持不变。添加第二种故障模式,即除了恒定的故障率之外发生的故障模式,结果是一个复杂的威布尔曲线,它不能很好地反映任何一种模式。当操作环境因客户而异时,很容易发生这种情况。几个例子将使这一点清晰可见。最后,给出了一些结论和建议,有助于在爬坡过程中分离失效模式。这些建议将有助于获得更好的估计计划保修成本和确定维修支持的必要。所描述的问题是真实存在的;引用了磁盘驱动器行业的例子,其中斜坡和多种故障模式交织在一起[1,2,3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信