SURREALISM AT THE SERVICE OF REVOLUTION – ? REVOLUTION AS A SCANDAL OF EXPOSURE

Predeina M. Yu
{"title":"SURREALISM AT THE SERVICE OF REVOLUTION – ? REVOLUTION AS A SCANDAL OF EXPOSURE","authors":"Predeina M. Yu","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/105-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Article Mic. Lifshits “Why am I not a modernist?” was published in 1963 in Estetika Prague and three years later reprinted in Russian in the Literary Gazette. The matter is long-standing, but the questions posed by the article or that rise after reading of the article are not yet resolved. First of all, what are these questions? – The question can be formulated historically, how did it happen that such an educated and even honest aestheticist as Mikhail Lifshits took a position against the avant-garde? Rather, along these lines, the spring exhibition of last year, devoted to M. Lifshits and held by the Moscow Museum of Modern Art Garage, poses the question. It is responsible for this question, because the position of Mic. Lifshits is Marxist position itself. The organizers of the exhibition, in essence, agree with Lifshits that Marxism is hostile to the avant-garde, and if this conclusion does not sound like a verdict to the avant-garde, it is only because they are not Marxists, i.e. because the question of the relation of Marxism to the avant-garde (and vice versa) they are no longer interested, or rather, interested in terms of what was passed. It is precisely this lack of interest that allows them to say ordinary enough: while the majority of the Soviet intelligentsia turned away from Marxism, this very majority condemned Lifshitz’s article as apostasy (apostasy from what?), Lifshits remained his firm supporter 1 . But why should we assume that the majority is already alienated and one Lifshits remained firm? This explanation hides from us the fact that the vanguard did not perceive itself as something anti-Marxist, rather, on the contrary. – Of course, not all avant-garde declared its Marxist sympathies, but, for example, Andre Breton stated and even was friends with Leon Trotsky, of course, even in the 60s the fact of such friendship could be regarded as evidence of the opposite of what I intend to prove. In other words the proof of the fascist","PeriodicalId":426343,"journal":{"name":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN HISTORICAL SCIENCE: THE EXPERIENCE OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND PROSPECTS FOR UKRAINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-108-7/105-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Article Mic. Lifshits “Why am I not a modernist?” was published in 1963 in Estetika Prague and three years later reprinted in Russian in the Literary Gazette. The matter is long-standing, but the questions posed by the article or that rise after reading of the article are not yet resolved. First of all, what are these questions? – The question can be formulated historically, how did it happen that such an educated and even honest aestheticist as Mikhail Lifshits took a position against the avant-garde? Rather, along these lines, the spring exhibition of last year, devoted to M. Lifshits and held by the Moscow Museum of Modern Art Garage, poses the question. It is responsible for this question, because the position of Mic. Lifshits is Marxist position itself. The organizers of the exhibition, in essence, agree with Lifshits that Marxism is hostile to the avant-garde, and if this conclusion does not sound like a verdict to the avant-garde, it is only because they are not Marxists, i.e. because the question of the relation of Marxism to the avant-garde (and vice versa) they are no longer interested, or rather, interested in terms of what was passed. It is precisely this lack of interest that allows them to say ordinary enough: while the majority of the Soviet intelligentsia turned away from Marxism, this very majority condemned Lifshitz’s article as apostasy (apostasy from what?), Lifshits remained his firm supporter 1 . But why should we assume that the majority is already alienated and one Lifshits remained firm? This explanation hides from us the fact that the vanguard did not perceive itself as something anti-Marxist, rather, on the contrary. – Of course, not all avant-garde declared its Marxist sympathies, but, for example, Andre Breton stated and even was friends with Leon Trotsky, of course, even in the 60s the fact of such friendship could be regarded as evidence of the opposite of what I intend to prove. In other words the proof of the fascist
为革命服务的超现实主义?革命是丑闻的曝光
文章简介Lifshits“为什么我不是现代主义者?”的文章1963年在《布拉格esttika》上发表,三年后在《文学公报》上以俄文转载。这件事由来已久,但文章提出的问题或阅读文章后产生的问题尚未得到解决。首先,这些问题是什么?这个问题可以从历史的角度来阐述,像Mikhail Lifshits这样一个受过良好教育甚至诚实的美学家是如何反对先锋派的?相反,在莫斯科现代艺术博物馆车库(Moscow Museum of Modern Art Garage)去年举办的以利夫希茨为主题的春季展上,人们提出了这样一个问题。它负责这个问题,因为Mic的位置。这就是马克思主义的立场本身。从本质上讲,这次展览的组织者同意Lifshits的观点,即马克思主义对先锋派是敌对的,如果这个结论听起来不像是对先锋派的判决,那只是因为他们不是马克思主义者,也就是说,因为马克思主义与先锋派的关系问题(反之亦然)他们不再感兴趣,或者更确切地说,他们对传递的内容不感兴趣。正是这种兴趣的缺乏让他们说得足够普通:当大多数苏联知识分子背离马克思主义时,正是这大多数谴责利夫希茨的文章是叛教(叛教什么?),利夫希茨仍然是他坚定的支持者。但是,我们为什么要假设大多数人已经被疏远了,只有一个Lifshits仍然坚定呢?这种解释向我们隐瞒了一个事实,即先锋队并不认为自己是反马克思主义的东西,相反,恰恰相反。-当然,并不是所有的先锋派都宣称自己同情马克思主义,但是,例如,安德烈·布列东声称甚至是莱昂·托洛茨基的朋友,当然,即使在60年代,这种友谊的事实也可以被视为与我想要证明的相反的证据。换句话说就是法西斯的证据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信