Together or not? The Effects of Individual and Group Work of the Faculty of Philology Students during E-learning Online

Anna Ślósarz
{"title":"Together or not? The Effects of Individual and Group Work of the Faculty of Philology Students during E-learning Online","authors":"Anna Ślósarz","doi":"10.31261/ijrel.2023.9.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tested a widespread belief that by working in groups distance education students achieve cognitive goals of learning, and develop their social competencies and skills. The subject of the study was the achievements of 655 bachelor and master degree students enrolled in 22 on-campus and blended learning units offered within 2 university courses, full-time and part-time, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e. in the academic years 2020/2021 and 2021/2022. An instrumental case study was carried out: the grades students obtained for individual work were compared with grades obtained for work done in pairs and groups of threes within the same courses. It was found that a statistically significant difference did not exist. But the highest grades (on average 83.81) were obtained by students who had worked individually, and the lowest (81.64%) by those who had worked in groups of three. The highest grades were obtained by the final-year students. They showed an understanding of the assessment criteria and the ability to follow such. Also, they wanted to pass on the first attempt in order to have time to prepare for the final examination. International students were reluctant to work in groups. They focused on achieving good grades and preparing for the thesis due to the time limits of student visas and the unrest caused by the war in Ukraine. First-year students who had no experience in adhering to the assessment criteria and problems with communicating due to isolation caused by the pandemic obtained the lowest grades.","PeriodicalId":193940,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in E-learning","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in E-learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/ijrel.2023.9.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article tested a widespread belief that by working in groups distance education students achieve cognitive goals of learning, and develop their social competencies and skills. The subject of the study was the achievements of 655 bachelor and master degree students enrolled in 22 on-campus and blended learning units offered within 2 university courses, full-time and part-time, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e. in the academic years 2020/2021 and 2021/2022. An instrumental case study was carried out: the grades students obtained for individual work were compared with grades obtained for work done in pairs and groups of threes within the same courses. It was found that a statistically significant difference did not exist. But the highest grades (on average 83.81) were obtained by students who had worked individually, and the lowest (81.64%) by those who had worked in groups of three. The highest grades were obtained by the final-year students. They showed an understanding of the assessment criteria and the ability to follow such. Also, they wanted to pass on the first attempt in order to have time to prepare for the final examination. International students were reluctant to work in groups. They focused on achieving good grades and preparing for the thesis due to the time limits of student visas and the unrest caused by the war in Ukraine. First-year students who had no experience in adhering to the assessment criteria and problems with communicating due to isolation caused by the pandemic obtained the lowest grades.
一起还是不一起?文学系学生在网上电子学习中个人与小组工作的效果
这篇文章测试了一个普遍的信念,即通过小组远程教育学生实现学习的认知目标,并发展他们的社会能力和技能。该研究的对象是在2020/2021学年和2021/2022学年期间和之后,即在2020/2021学年和2021/2022学年,在2个全日制和非全日制大学课程中开设的22个校内混合学习单元的655名本科和硕士学生的成果。进行了一项工具性案例研究:将学生个人作业的成绩与在同一课程中两人一组或三人一组完成的作业的成绩进行比较。结果发现不存在统计学上的显著差异。但是,单独学习的学生获得了最高的分数(平均83.81分),而三人小组学习的学生获得了最低的分数(81.64%)。最后一年的学生取得了最高分。他们表现出对评估标准的理解和遵循这些标准的能力。此外,他们想通过第一次尝试,以便有时间准备期末考试。国际学生不愿意在小组中工作。由于学生签证的时间限制和乌克兰战争引发的动荡,他们专注于取得好成绩和准备论文。没有遵守评估标准的经验以及由于大流行造成的隔离而出现沟通问题的一年级学生得分最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信