Dissident Banknote Interventions

IF 0.1
César Barros A.
{"title":"Dissident Banknote Interventions","authors":"César Barros A.","doi":"10.1525/lavc.2023.5.3.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the collective practice of banknote intervention—dissident stamping and scribbling—by focusing on different cases in Brazil (1975) and Chile (1973, 2019). It aims, first, at understanding the role of money from the vantage point of the relation between State and market; and second, at grasping the role of banknote imagery within an ideological State-market apparatus that both visibilizes and invisibilizes the link between economics and politics. By examining banknote interventions, I argue that this dissident practice disturbs and unmasks an invisible foundation of sovereignty while leaving the economic function of money intact. Lastly, it also aims at pushing the boundaries of artistic exceptionalism by inserting Cildo Meireles’s famous banknote interventions into a genealogy that surpasses the realm of art. Approaching Quem matou Herzog? (Who Killed Herzog?, 1975) and Projeto cédula (Banknote Project, 1970–) within this genealogy enables us to see some of the effects of Meireles’s intervention that have been obscured by a reading that locates them exclusively within the realm of art, singularity, and originality.","PeriodicalId":211015,"journal":{"name":"Latin American and Latinx Visual Culture","volume":"60 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American and Latinx Visual Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/lavc.2023.5.3.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the collective practice of banknote intervention—dissident stamping and scribbling—by focusing on different cases in Brazil (1975) and Chile (1973, 2019). It aims, first, at understanding the role of money from the vantage point of the relation between State and market; and second, at grasping the role of banknote imagery within an ideological State-market apparatus that both visibilizes and invisibilizes the link between economics and politics. By examining banknote interventions, I argue that this dissident practice disturbs and unmasks an invisible foundation of sovereignty while leaving the economic function of money intact. Lastly, it also aims at pushing the boundaries of artistic exceptionalism by inserting Cildo Meireles’s famous banknote interventions into a genealogy that surpasses the realm of art. Approaching Quem matou Herzog? (Who Killed Herzog?, 1975) and Projeto cédula (Banknote Project, 1970–) within this genealogy enables us to see some of the effects of Meireles’s intervention that have been obscured by a reading that locates them exclusively within the realm of art, singularity, and originality.
持不同政见的纸币干预
本文通过关注巴西(1975年)和智利(1973年、2019年)的不同案例,分析了纸币干预的集体实践——持不同政见者的盖章和涂鸦。首先,它旨在从国家与市场关系的有利角度理解货币的作用;第二,抓住钞票形象在意识形态的国家-市场机器中的作用,这种机器既能看到经济与政治之间的联系,也能看到经济与政治之间的联系。通过对纸币干预的研究,我认为,这种持不同政见者的做法扰乱并揭露了主权的无形基础,同时保持了货币的经济功能不变。最后,它还旨在通过将Cildo Meireles著名的纸币干预插入超越艺术领域的谱系中,从而推动艺术例外主义的界限。接近奎姆·马图·赫尔佐格?(谁杀了赫尔佐格?在这个系谱中,我们可以看到Meireles干预的一些影响,这些影响被一种解读所掩盖,这种解读将它们完全定位在艺术、独特性和独创性的领域内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书