Politics versus Economics: An Overview of International Political Economy

T. Nobayashi
{"title":"Politics versus Economics: An Overview of International Political Economy","authors":"T. Nobayashi","doi":"10.15057/8155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1970s, academia has made serious endeavors toward the development of International Political Economy (IPE). This discipline initially emerged from the field of International Relations that came into being after World War I, but it differs from the previous studies in many aspects. The most significant characteristic of IPE can be found in the emphasis it places on the interactions between the economics and the politics. The students of International Relations have traditionally regarded as critically and centrally important the military and security aspects of power politics and considered the balance of power as the ultimate mechanism to secure stability. IPE necessitates a shift, if not a change, in this preset perception, treating the economics as an equally significant factor. IPE reflects the dynamic and turbulent political and economic course of events after World War II. Throughout the Cold War, military and security issues were inevitably defmed as the \"high politics\" and played a crucial role. Needless to say, the economics, confined in the bounds of the \"low politics,\" attracted considerably less attention. However, as the Cold War structure diversified and deteriorated, and as the Bretton Woods regime gradually lost its effectiveness in maintaining the economic coalition within the Western bloc, economic issues began to seem far more problematic than ever. Furthermore, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, military and security issues ceased to receive the contemplation and cogitation that it had enjoyed. Instead, the economics came to assume more importance. Such issues as trade conflicts between nations, restructuring of the international economic order, and international competition involving industrial productivity and technological advancement came to present themselves as highly strategic. More to the point, these events elevated the economics to the realm of the \"high politics.\" IPE has thus emanated as a viable and practical medium by which the international relations in the present can be effectively analyzed. As each state strives to increase its individual productivity and to nurture its high technology industries, interactions among nations do not and cannot only remain political but they also become economic. This","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/8155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1970s, academia has made serious endeavors toward the development of International Political Economy (IPE). This discipline initially emerged from the field of International Relations that came into being after World War I, but it differs from the previous studies in many aspects. The most significant characteristic of IPE can be found in the emphasis it places on the interactions between the economics and the politics. The students of International Relations have traditionally regarded as critically and centrally important the military and security aspects of power politics and considered the balance of power as the ultimate mechanism to secure stability. IPE necessitates a shift, if not a change, in this preset perception, treating the economics as an equally significant factor. IPE reflects the dynamic and turbulent political and economic course of events after World War II. Throughout the Cold War, military and security issues were inevitably defmed as the "high politics" and played a crucial role. Needless to say, the economics, confined in the bounds of the "low politics," attracted considerably less attention. However, as the Cold War structure diversified and deteriorated, and as the Bretton Woods regime gradually lost its effectiveness in maintaining the economic coalition within the Western bloc, economic issues began to seem far more problematic than ever. Furthermore, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, military and security issues ceased to receive the contemplation and cogitation that it had enjoyed. Instead, the economics came to assume more importance. Such issues as trade conflicts between nations, restructuring of the international economic order, and international competition involving industrial productivity and technological advancement came to present themselves as highly strategic. More to the point, these events elevated the economics to the realm of the "high politics." IPE has thus emanated as a viable and practical medium by which the international relations in the present can be effectively analyzed. As each state strives to increase its individual productivity and to nurture its high technology industries, interactions among nations do not and cannot only remain political but they also become economic. This
政治与经济:国际政治经济学概览
自20世纪70年代以来,学术界对国际政治经济学的发展进行了认真的努力。这门学科最初产生于第一次世界大战后形成的国际关系领域,但它与以往的研究有许多不同。国际政治经济学最显著的特点是强调经济与政治的相互作用。国际关系专业的学生传统上认为强权政治的军事和安全方面具有关键性和核心重要性,并认为权力平衡是确保稳定的最终机制。国际政治经济学需要改变这种预设的观念,将经济视为一个同等重要的因素。国际政治经济学反映了第二次世界大战后充满活力和动荡的政治和经济进程。在整个冷战过程中,军事和安全问题不可避免地被定义为“高级政治”,并发挥着至关重要的作用。不用说,经济被限制在“低级政治”的范围内,引起的关注要少得多。然而,随着冷战结构的多样化和恶化,随着布雷顿森林体系逐渐失去其维持西方集团内部经济联盟的有效性,经济问题开始显得比以往任何时候都更加棘手。此外,随着苏联的解体和冷战的结束,军事和安全问题不再得到它曾经享有的思考和考虑。相反,经济因素变得更为重要。国与国之间的贸易冲突、国际经济秩序的重构、涉及产业生产力和技术进步的国际竞争等问题,呈现出高度的战略性。更重要的是,这些事件将经济学提升到了“高级政治”的领域。因此,国际政治经济学已经成为一种可行的、实用的媒介,可以有效地分析当前的国际关系。随着每个国家都努力提高其个人生产力并培育其高科技产业,国与国之间的互动不只是政治上的,也不可能只是政治上的,而且还会变成经济上的。这
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信