KONSEP MAQASHID AL-SYARI`AH: PERBANDINGAN ANTARA PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN AL-SYATHIBI

Suansar Khatib
{"title":"KONSEP MAQASHID AL-SYARI`AH: PERBANDINGAN ANTARA PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN AL-SYATHIBI","authors":"Suansar Khatib","doi":"10.29300/mzn.v5i1.1436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explains the comparison of maqashid al-shari'ah thinking between al-Ghazali and al-Syathibi. The purpose and core of all Islamic teachings (Qur'an and hadith) is benefit. The need to prioritize the benefit of religious texts and ijma in the Muamalah region and adat if there is a contradiction between the two. Benefits prepared by humans must be included in the benefit of the text if there is a contradiction between the two. Both of them also agreed that the benefit was intended, the essence returned to the protection of humans themselves, but according to al-Thufi maslahah is the most authoritative independent proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not an authoritative proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not a legal proposition, but as the core and purpose of a law. According to him all the Islamic Shari'ah teachings have a causal relationship (muamalah) with benefit in the customary territory and muamalah. Intellect (intellect) of normal human beings can also know and find benefit in the area of muamalah and adat (tradition) not in the area of worship","PeriodicalId":270806,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v5i1.1436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This article explains the comparison of maqashid al-shari'ah thinking between al-Ghazali and al-Syathibi. The purpose and core of all Islamic teachings (Qur'an and hadith) is benefit. The need to prioritize the benefit of religious texts and ijma in the Muamalah region and adat if there is a contradiction between the two. Benefits prepared by humans must be included in the benefit of the text if there is a contradiction between the two. Both of them also agreed that the benefit was intended, the essence returned to the protection of humans themselves, but according to al-Thufi maslahah is the most authoritative independent proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not an authoritative proposition to determine legal policy. Benefit is not a legal proposition, but as the core and purpose of a law. According to him all the Islamic Shari'ah teachings have a causal relationship (muamalah) with benefit in the customary territory and muamalah. Intellect (intellect) of normal human beings can also know and find benefit in the area of muamalah and adat (tradition) not in the area of worship
这篇文章解释了maqashid al-shari’ah思想在al-Ghazali和al-Syathibi之间的比较。所有伊斯兰教义(古兰经和圣训)的目的和核心是利益。必须优先考虑宗教文本和伊玛在穆阿马拉地区的利益,并确定两者之间是否存在矛盾。如果两者之间存在矛盾,则必须将人为准备的利益包括在文本的利益中。二者也一致认为,利益是有意为之,本质回归到保护人类自身,但根据al-Thufi maslahah是确定法律政策的最权威的独立命题。利益不是确定法律政策的权威命题。利益不是一个法律命题,而是法律的核心和目的。根据他的说法,所有伊斯兰教法教义都有一个因果关系(muamalah),有利于习惯领土和muamalah。正常人类的智力(智力)也可以在muamalah和adat(传统)领域而不是在崇拜领域了解和找到好处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信