Review of PHEV and HEV operation and control research for future direction

S. Overington, S. Rajakaruna
{"title":"Review of PHEV and HEV operation and control research for future direction","authors":"S. Overington, S. Rajakaruna","doi":"10.1109/PEDG.2012.6254031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies recent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) and hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) literature for the purpose of analysis in determining future direction. The authors have utilized and expanded on a procedure for analyzing control strategies which is found in Wirasingha et al. The existing procedure allocates control strategies into the four categories previously determined optimization based blended control, rule based blended control, multi-mode control, and hybrid only control and is given the heading control paradigms in this paper. Extending on this control strategy classification in the identification of the control paradigms, the ranking of individual controllers is undertaken in the control schemes section of this paper, to scrutinize the advantages and disadvantages of each system. This ranking system identifies three control strategies of significant interest to PHEV and HEV operation; predictive optimization, adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy (A-ECMS), and online optimization controllers. Additionally the analysis completed identifies a comparison of selected controller performance attributes namely: accuracy, computational complexity, a priori knowledge and portability, which determine the potential outcomes of integrating control systems with the respective strategies. From the analysis of existing literature the summary of this article realizes the PHEV and HEV operation and control design criteria that have shown significant improvements to performance and that are of particular importance for future design integration and implementation.","PeriodicalId":146438,"journal":{"name":"2012 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDG.2012.6254031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This paper identifies recent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) and hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) literature for the purpose of analysis in determining future direction. The authors have utilized and expanded on a procedure for analyzing control strategies which is found in Wirasingha et al. The existing procedure allocates control strategies into the four categories previously determined optimization based blended control, rule based blended control, multi-mode control, and hybrid only control and is given the heading control paradigms in this paper. Extending on this control strategy classification in the identification of the control paradigms, the ranking of individual controllers is undertaken in the control schemes section of this paper, to scrutinize the advantages and disadvantages of each system. This ranking system identifies three control strategies of significant interest to PHEV and HEV operation; predictive optimization, adaptive equivalent consumption minimization strategy (A-ECMS), and online optimization controllers. Additionally the analysis completed identifies a comparison of selected controller performance attributes namely: accuracy, computational complexity, a priori knowledge and portability, which determine the potential outcomes of integrating control systems with the respective strategies. From the analysis of existing literature the summary of this article realizes the PHEV and HEV operation and control design criteria that have shown significant improvements to performance and that are of particular importance for future design integration and implementation.
对插电式混合动力汽车和混合动力汽车的运行控制研究进行综述,展望未来发展方向
本文对插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)和混合动力汽车(HEV)的最新文献进行了分析,以确定未来的发展方向。作者利用并扩展了Wirasingha等人的控制策略分析程序。该方法将控制策略分为基于优化的混合控制、基于规则的混合控制、多模式控制和仅混合控制四类,并给出了航向控制范式。在控制范式识别中的控制策略分类的基础上,在本文的控制方案部分进行了单个控制器的排序,以仔细检查每个系统的优缺点。该排名系统确定了对插电式混合动力汽车和混合动力汽车运营有重大意义的三种控制策略;预测优化、自适应等效消耗最小化策略(A-ECMS)和在线优化控制器。此外,完成的分析确定了选定控制器性能属性的比较,即:准确性,计算复杂性,先验知识和可移植性,这些属性决定了将控制系统与各自策略集成的潜在结果。通过对现有文献的分析,本文的总结实现了PHEV和HEV的操作和控制设计标准,这些标准在性能上有显著的改进,对未来的设计集成和实施特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信