Comparación de dos métodos para reconocimiento de dígitos manuscritos fuera de línea

María Cristina Guevara Neri, Osslan O. Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, J. H. S. Azuela
{"title":"Comparación de dos métodos para reconocimiento de dígitos manuscritos fuera de línea","authors":"María Cristina Guevara Neri, Osslan O. Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, J. H. S. Azuela","doi":"10.13053/rcs-147-5-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the results of the comparison between two off-line handwritten digits recognition methods are presented. The first method is a network of perceptrons with which the images were classified after making a comparison by pairs of classes; the second, is a new method that performs a pixel by pixel comparison between the image to be classified, and the reference images. For the tests, a subset of 450 images from the MNIST database was used. Each method was evaluated in two parts: first, with a set of 100 training images, and second, with a set of 350 test images. With the first classifier, an accuracy of 93.86% was obtained, and with the second, an accuracy of 95.14%. After the analysis of the results, it is shown that the second method outperformed the first. The strength of the new method lies mainly in its robustness and execution time.","PeriodicalId":279869,"journal":{"name":"Research in Computing Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Computing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13053/rcs-147-5-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the results of the comparison between two off-line handwritten digits recognition methods are presented. The first method is a network of perceptrons with which the images were classified after making a comparison by pairs of classes; the second, is a new method that performs a pixel by pixel comparison between the image to be classified, and the reference images. For the tests, a subset of 450 images from the MNIST database was used. Each method was evaluated in two parts: first, with a set of 100 training images, and second, with a set of 350 test images. With the first classifier, an accuracy of 93.86% was obtained, and with the second, an accuracy of 95.14%. After the analysis of the results, it is shown that the second method outperformed the first. The strength of the new method lies mainly in its robustness and execution time.
两种离线手写数字识别方法的比较
本文给出了两种离线手写体数字识别方法的比较结果。第一种方法是一个感知器网络,通过对类进行比较后对图像进行分类;第二种方法是将待分类图像与参考图像逐像素进行比较。对于测试,使用了来自MNIST数据库的450个图像子集。每种方法分为两部分进行评估:第一部分使用一组100张训练图像,第二部分使用一组350张测试图像。第一种分类器的准确率为93.86%,第二种分类器的准确率为95.14%。分析结果表明,第二种方法优于第一种方法。新方法的优点主要体现在鲁棒性和执行时间上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信