Case 22

Scott Kohler
{"title":"Case 22","authors":"Scott Kohler","doi":"10.1002/9781119519461.ch22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. When, in 1950, the Ford Foundation became the world’s largest private philanthropy, it did not immediately begin to throw money into hands-on programming. Rather, the Foundation, quite often over the next three decades, preferred to fund studies and analysis, believing that thorough research could unlock the solution to many of society’s most pressing concerns. Nowhere has this approach yielded higher returns, nor left such lasting monuments, than in the field of public policy research. Between 1950 and 1981, the Ford Foundation was the catalyst for building and strengthening a host of research institutions, operating in several different fields, to inject statistical and economic analysis into the policy-making process. In addition, the Foundation provided significant support for several existing policy research organizations, helping to build them into eminent centers of social science research and application. Strategy. In Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise, Andrew Rich explains that the Ford Foundation “actively pursued a program supporting ‘knowledge-creating’ institutions . . . [and was] a principal source of support for many think tanks.”320 These institutions created or supported by the Foundation have many similarities, but each operates within its own niche of the policy-making process. Among the most significant321 are the following:","PeriodicalId":416183,"journal":{"name":"Small Animal Dermatology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Animal Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119519461.ch22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. When, in 1950, the Ford Foundation became the world’s largest private philanthropy, it did not immediately begin to throw money into hands-on programming. Rather, the Foundation, quite often over the next three decades, preferred to fund studies and analysis, believing that thorough research could unlock the solution to many of society’s most pressing concerns. Nowhere has this approach yielded higher returns, nor left such lasting monuments, than in the field of public policy research. Between 1950 and 1981, the Ford Foundation was the catalyst for building and strengthening a host of research institutions, operating in several different fields, to inject statistical and economic analysis into the policy-making process. In addition, the Foundation provided significant support for several existing policy research organizations, helping to build them into eminent centers of social science research and application. Strategy. In Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise, Andrew Rich explains that the Ford Foundation “actively pursued a program supporting ‘knowledge-creating’ institutions . . . [and was] a principal source of support for many think tanks.”320 These institutions created or supported by the Foundation have many similarities, but each operates within its own niche of the policy-making process. Among the most significant321 are the following:
例22
背景。1950年,当福特基金会成为世界上最大的私人慈善机构时,它并没有立即开始把钱投入到实际操作的项目中。相反,在接下来的三十年里,基金会更倾向于资助研究和分析,相信彻底的研究可以解开许多社会最紧迫问题的解决方案。在公共政策研究领域,这种方法带来的回报最高,也没有留下如此持久的印记。1950年至1981年间,福特基金会推动了一系列研究机构的建立和加强,这些研究机构在几个不同的领域开展工作,将统计和经济分析注入决策过程。此外,基金会还为一些现有的政策研究机构提供了大量支持,帮助它们成为著名的社会科学研究和应用中心。策略。在《智库、公共政策和专家政治》一书中,安德鲁·里奇解释说,福特基金会“积极推行一项支持‘知识创造’机构的计划……(也是)许多智库的主要支持来源。“这些基金会创建或支持的机构有许多相似之处,但每个机构都在自己的决策过程中运作。其中最重要的321是:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信