The Terms and Conditions of Employment of International Civil Servants: Implied Terms Recognized by the Asian Development Bank Administrative Tribunal

Damien Eastman
{"title":"The Terms and Conditions of Employment of International Civil Servants: Implied Terms Recognized by the Asian Development Bank Administrative Tribunal","authors":"Damien Eastman","doi":"10.1163/9789004441033_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the ‘terms and conditions of employment’ applicable under the law of the international civil service, with a focus on ‘implied terms’ of employment arising in the context of the case law of the Administrative Tribunal of the Asian Development Bank (adbat). Why is this important? Clearly, as a matter of good governance and good order, an employee ought to have an understanding and appreciation of the respective duties and obligations applicable to the employment relationship between the individual and the employer organization, and by the same token, the employer should have an understanding of the standards against which its actions will be assessed. It is also important because it crystalizes the basis upon which the jurisdiction of an international organization’s administrative tribunal can be invoked. International administrative tribunals are creatures of limited jurisdiction, and they are generally confined to hearing and adjudicating disputes alleging a breach of the ‘terms and conditions of appointment’. This argument is therefore developed through an examination of the jurisprudence surrounding the terms and conditions of employment of international civil servants, and in particular by analyzing the expansive approach to identifying the terms of appointment adopted by the adbat. * Damien J. Eastman, Assistant General Counsel, Asian Development Bank (ADB), deastman@ adb.org. The author wishes to thank Ms Melissa Su Thomas, Senior Counsel, ADB, for her assistance in preparing this chapter. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of ADB or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term ‘country’ in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Damien J. Eastman 9789004441033 Downloaded from Brill.com11/14/2020 02:53:14AM via free access","PeriodicalId":164763,"journal":{"name":"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004441033_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the ‘terms and conditions of employment’ applicable under the law of the international civil service, with a focus on ‘implied terms’ of employment arising in the context of the case law of the Administrative Tribunal of the Asian Development Bank (adbat). Why is this important? Clearly, as a matter of good governance and good order, an employee ought to have an understanding and appreciation of the respective duties and obligations applicable to the employment relationship between the individual and the employer organization, and by the same token, the employer should have an understanding of the standards against which its actions will be assessed. It is also important because it crystalizes the basis upon which the jurisdiction of an international organization’s administrative tribunal can be invoked. International administrative tribunals are creatures of limited jurisdiction, and they are generally confined to hearing and adjudicating disputes alleging a breach of the ‘terms and conditions of appointment’. This argument is therefore developed through an examination of the jurisprudence surrounding the terms and conditions of employment of international civil servants, and in particular by analyzing the expansive approach to identifying the terms of appointment adopted by the adbat. * Damien J. Eastman, Assistant General Counsel, Asian Development Bank (ADB), deastman@ adb.org. The author wishes to thank Ms Melissa Su Thomas, Senior Counsel, ADB, for her assistance in preparing this chapter. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of ADB or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term ‘country’ in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Damien J. Eastman 9789004441033 Downloaded from Brill.com11/14/2020 02:53:14AM via free access
《国际公务员雇用条款及条件:经亚洲开发银行行政法庭认可的隐含条款》
本章探讨在国际公务员制度法律下适用的“雇佣条款和条件”,重点是在亚洲开发银行行政法庭(adbat)的判例法背景下产生的雇佣“隐含条款”。为什么这很重要?显然,作为良好治理和良好秩序的问题,雇员应该了解和赞赏个人与雇主组织之间适用于雇佣关系的各自职责和义务,同样,雇主也应该了解评估其行动的标准。它之所以重要,还因为它明确了可以援引一个国际组织的行政法庭管辖权的基础。国际行政法庭是有限管辖权的产物,它们通常仅限于审理和裁决指控违反“任命条款和条件”的争端。因此,这一论点是通过审查有关雇用国际公务员的条款和条件的判例,特别是通过分析确定任命条件的广泛方法而发展起来的。* Damien J. Eastman,亚洲开发银行助理总法律顾问,deastman@adb.org。作者谨感谢亚行高级律师Melissa Su Thomas女士协助编写本章。本出版物中表达的观点是作者的观点,并不一定反映亚行或其理事会或其所代表的政府的观点和政策。亚行不保证本出版物中包含的数据的准确性,对使用这些数据的任何后果不承担任何责任。提及特定公司或制造商的产品并不意味着亚行对它们的认可或推荐优于未提及的其他类似性质的公司或产品。通过指定或提及特定领土或地理区域,或在本文件中使用“国家”一词,亚行无意对任何领土或地区的法律或其他地位作出任何判断。Damien J. Eastman 9789004441033 from Brill.com11/14/2020 02:53:14AM免费下载
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信