The Enlightenment’s Criticism of Religion: Theology

Jon Stewart
{"title":"The Enlightenment’s Criticism of Religion: Theology","authors":"Jon Stewart","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192842930.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motivation of Hegel’s philosophy of religion developed in reaction to the religious situation that he found himself in at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This chapter and the next sketch the main issues stemming from the Enlightenment to which Hegel was reacting. This chapter focuses on the Enlightenment’s criticism of religion specifically in the fields of theology and biblical studies. Through much of the Middle Ages, the dogmas of the Christian religion were regarded collectively as a field of scholarly study alongside the sciences. However, with the rapid development of the empirical sciences, religion suddenly appeared to be based on a dubious foundation. The thinkers of the Enlightenment wanted merely to hold firm to what they regarded as rational, while purging religion of what they took to be superstitious, childish views without foundation. After rejecting Christianity, the philosophes ended up with Deism, that is, a simple, very general belief in a Supreme Being. Hegel takes one of the main negative aspects of the Enlightenment to be its dismissal of the traditional Christian dogmas. The result is an empty abstraction that is meaningless from a religious point of view. An account is given of Voltaire’s Deism in his work God and Human Beings. A brief overview is provided of the scepticism about the veracity of the sacred texts in the field of biblical studies. This is exemplified by a reading of Hermann Samuel Reimarus so-called ‘Wolfenbüttel Fragments’ that were published by Lessing.","PeriodicalId":321408,"journal":{"name":"An Introduction to Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"813 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Introduction to Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192842930.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The motivation of Hegel’s philosophy of religion developed in reaction to the religious situation that he found himself in at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This chapter and the next sketch the main issues stemming from the Enlightenment to which Hegel was reacting. This chapter focuses on the Enlightenment’s criticism of religion specifically in the fields of theology and biblical studies. Through much of the Middle Ages, the dogmas of the Christian religion were regarded collectively as a field of scholarly study alongside the sciences. However, with the rapid development of the empirical sciences, religion suddenly appeared to be based on a dubious foundation. The thinkers of the Enlightenment wanted merely to hold firm to what they regarded as rational, while purging religion of what they took to be superstitious, childish views without foundation. After rejecting Christianity, the philosophes ended up with Deism, that is, a simple, very general belief in a Supreme Being. Hegel takes one of the main negative aspects of the Enlightenment to be its dismissal of the traditional Christian dogmas. The result is an empty abstraction that is meaningless from a religious point of view. An account is given of Voltaire’s Deism in his work God and Human Beings. A brief overview is provided of the scepticism about the veracity of the sacred texts in the field of biblical studies. This is exemplified by a reading of Hermann Samuel Reimarus so-called ‘Wolfenbüttel Fragments’ that were published by Lessing.
启蒙运动对宗教的批判:神学
黑格尔宗教哲学的动机是对他在19世纪初所处的宗教环境的反应。这一章和下一章概述了黑格尔所反对的启蒙运动的主要问题。本章着重于启蒙运动对宗教的批判,特别是在神学和圣经研究领域。在中世纪的大部分时间里,基督教的教义被视为与科学并列的学术研究领域。然而,随着实证科学的迅速发展,宗教突然出现了一个可疑的基础。启蒙运动的思想家们只想坚持他们认为是理性的东西,同时清除宗教中他们认为是迷信的、幼稚的、没有根据的观点。在拒绝基督教之后,哲学家们最终接受了自然神论,也就是说,一种简单的,非常普遍的信仰,相信一个至高无上的存在。黑格尔认为启蒙运动的一个主要消极方面是对传统基督教教义的摒弃。其结果是一个空洞的抽象,从宗教的观点来看是毫无意义的。伏尔泰在其著作《上帝与人类》中论述了自然神论。简要概述了在圣经研究领域对神圣文本真实性的怀疑。这可以从赫尔曼·塞缪尔·Reimarus的《wolfenbttel Fragments》中得到例证莱辛出版了这篇文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信